The Instigator
fdsaBIG
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Zarroette
Con (against)
Winning
56 Points

sex is wrong

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 12 votes the winner is...
Zarroette
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/22/2014 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 876 times Debate No: 59407
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (12)

 

Zarroette

Con

Since Pro has the burden of proof [1], in that he/she must affirm the resolution, my opponent needed to provide arguments. My opponent has not affirmed his/her side by failing to provide arguments. Therefore, my opponent loses this debate.

References:

[1] http://www.nizkor.org......
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
12 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by patrick967 2 years ago
patrick967
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Lack of argument by pro.
Vote Placed by kinsky 2 years ago
kinsky
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: so many noob-snipes
Vote Placed by XLAV 2 years ago
XLAV
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to give BoP. Spelling and grammar, sources, and arguments points goes to Con.
Vote Placed by AngelofDeath 2 years ago
AngelofDeath
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Lol the rfd's for this debate
Vote Placed by Envisage 2 years ago
Envisage
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: W...what? Three one round debates? With the same guy?? Let me check the next one....
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pro presented no arguments.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con actually made an argument.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro provided no arguments. Con gets conduct points for being pretty.
Vote Placed by Mojique 2 years ago
Mojique
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument was nonexistant, and looses everything but conduct. Also affirmation of this resolution suggests an antinatalist position, which is why i find it ironic that Zaroette is debating con. easy ELO?
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Spell check fail... I do wonder who pro is an alt for.