The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
1 Points

sharia for all

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/15/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 645 times Debate No: 91277
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)




sharia is the ultimate law of God and should be the law of every government even if it has to be achieved with violence


To be honest, I don't really want to thank Pro for instigating this debate topic. I believe that they don't know what Sharia is, how it is applied and they don't know that the Sharia itself is against such a violence. But anyways, since they have started this, then I will reply to their claims.


The resolution I would like to debate is as follows:

"Sharia should be the law of every government, even if it has to be achieved with violence."


The BOP is fully on Pro!

They have to show that:

Sharia should be the law of every government, even if it has to be achieved with violence.

I don't make any claim. My only BOP is to negate Pro's arguments, not the resolution. However, I may provide evidence to show that the part "even if it has to be achieved with violence" is contradictory to Sharia itself, but this is not necessary for me to fill my BOP.



The religion of Islam as a whole, including religious commands (prayers etc.) and prohibitions, legal judgments etc. based on the Qur'an (the Holy Book of Islam), the Hadith (sayings and daily practices of the Prophet of Islam, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)) and Ijma' of 'Ulama (Consensus of Muslim Scholars).

Debate Round No. 1


rapeiskindofok forfeited this round.


Pro forfeited R2, no argument was presented for me to negate..
Debate Round No. 2


rapeiskindofok forfeited this round.


Since BOP was fully on Pro and since they didn't provide any argument, then there is nothing for me to counter..

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Zairik 2 years ago
I am a Muslim but rapeiskindofok is a f o o l......these kind of Muslims are what's wrong with the planet. His opening statement itself is not right. Shari law can't be achieved by violence. To be ruled under Sharia law itself is choice.

Read about the Reign of Umar(R.A). This link will give you some idea(not super-accurate) -->
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro ff many times, so conduct to Con.