The Instigator
SpokenGospel
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
tkubok
Pro (for)
Winning
20 Points

should I play reach with a gay kid named colt

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/31/2011 Category: Society
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,187 times Debate No: 15734
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

SpokenGospel

Con

I say no because I don't want to
tkubok

Pro

Cool name. You should play with him.

After all, who cares. If he's good, keep playing with him. If he's bad, never play with him again. That's all that matters, whether he's good or bad. Nothing else, not even his name, matters.

Take Lim Yo-Hwan as an example(1). He is the champion for the Korean Starcraft competition. Yet, his name is ridiculous and gay. But would his allies, care about his name, or do they care about winning?

Sources
1). http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 1
SpokenGospel

Con

SpokenGospel forfeited this round.
tkubok

Pro

My opponent has forfeited the last round. I have nothing else to say.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Man-is-good 5 years ago
Man-is-good
pointless; better suited to a forum
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Koopin 5 years ago
Koopin
SpokenGospeltkubokTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Did not use period, sources, argument, and forfeited.
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
SpokenGospeltkubokTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: "Yet, his name is ridiculous and gay." - damn, that is my kids name.
Vote Placed by socialpinko 6 years ago
socialpinko
SpokenGospeltkubokTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: pointless debate but con forfeited, brought an incoherent argument and used no sources.
Vote Placed by Chrysippus 6 years ago
Chrysippus
SpokenGospeltkubokTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's forfeit and stupidity hands this "debate" to tkubok.