The Instigator
nrpaul1015
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
RoNaN
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

should abortion only be allowed to rape victims?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
nrpaul1015
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/3/2013 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 669 times Debate No: 41634
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

nrpaul1015

Pro

I believe that if someone is wrongfully forced into sexual activities and are impregnated then they should be allowed to have an abortion.
If a girl is just irresponsible enough to have sex and get pregnant, then they should not be allowed. It is killing a person just because of a stupid love story.
In round one present arguments and in round two attack if you want.
RoNaN

Con

I think that abortion is wrong but if they were raped it wasn't there fault they're pregnant so I think it's right
Debate Round No. 1
nrpaul1015

Pro

this was my point of view. I don't understand why you took this debate if you agree why not comment?
RoNaN

Con

RoNaN forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by BigAl95 3 years ago
BigAl95
How do you define person? How are they separate from other animals such as dogs, (minus the obvious of one being a dog)? And what do you find to be the purpose of life, (preferably something definitive and not "fulfilling God's will" or something along those lines)?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by ndedo 3 years ago
ndedo
nrpaul1015RoNaNTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con ff, and Pro made an argument - which apparently was so convincing that Con felt the need to accept the debate to state his agreement....
Vote Placed by JackFritschy 3 years ago
JackFritschy
nrpaul1015RoNaNTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't even understand the debate