The Instigator
lol456
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
fire_wings
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points

should action figures be banned

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
fire_wings
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/28/2016 Category: Cars
Updated: 8 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 506 times Debate No: 91993
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

lol456

Con

they should be banned because they brake easily or people eat them (little kids).
fire_wings

Pro

My opponent is arguing in my side. I ask the BoP to be shared. I will be providing arguments, but Con had already provided arguments for me, as he is Con in the resolution of "should action figures be banned?", so he needs to say that action figures should not be banned, but instead argues my side. Therefore, right now I am filling my BoP, as Con argued against himself, and made no arguments for himself.

Vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 1
lol456

Con

lol456 forfeited this round.
fire_wings

Pro

Extend

(You don't need to read this part, not even an argument, but I just like Trolling

Action is doing a action, such as moving. a figure is a non-living minicharacter. However, an action is moving, but it is non-living, so it doesn't even exist)
Debate Round No. 2
lol456

Con

lol456 forfeited this round.
fire_wings

Pro

EXTEND!!!!!!!!
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by dsjpk5 8 months ago
dsjpk5
You're arguing the Pro position. Edit the debate and fix it.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by tejretics 8 months ago
tejretics
lol456fire_wingsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by RoyLatham 8 months ago
RoyLatham
lol456fire_wingsTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con argued for the wrong side, losing arguments. Con forfeited losing conduct. Con only wrote sentence and failed to capitalize and misspelled "break," losing S&G
Vote Placed by famousdebater 8 months ago
famousdebater
lol456fire_wingsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con argued for Pro's advocacy and then forfeited all rounds. Con presented a case in his favour. His burden was therefore advanced and con wins by default. Conduct also goes to con for Pro's forfeitures.