The Instigator
kiran123
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
vwv
Pro (for)
Winning
11 Points

should animals really, be tortured with chemicals in beauty products?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
vwv
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/13/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 444 times Debate No: 63152
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

kiran123

Con

Should animals really be tortured with chemicals from beauty products?
vwv

Pro

For the preliminary stages, yes. Jus tso was don't literally have skin peeling off of a human being.
Debate Round No. 1
kiran123

Con

kiran123 forfeited this round.
vwv

Pro

Better to make a rat writhe in agony than a human being... Unless they are worse than a rat by what they have done... never mind...

This was forfeited anyway.
Debate Round No. 2
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by MyDinosaurHands 2 years ago
MyDinosaurHands
We have synthetic skin that could test for something as basic as what Pro is talking about.
Posted by Mr.Lee 2 years ago
Mr.Lee
Why don't we just test them on trees? Even trees want the "London Look!"
Posted by crushboy79 2 years ago
crushboy79
So? I got a question for Pro, are you a Christian? If not, what is wrong with testing it on people?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by imabench 2 years ago
imabench
kiran123vwvTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
kiran123vwvTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
kiran123vwvTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff