The Instigator
canadianbennett
Con (against)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
STALIN
Pro (for)
Winning
14 Points

should bitcoin be banned

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
STALIN
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/23/2014 Category: Technology
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 634 times Debate No: 44508
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

canadianbennett

Con

Yes because people have the freedom how and where they can store there money
STALIN

Pro

People do have that freedom. The only problem is that this argument does not support your position.
Debate Round No. 1
canadianbennett

Con

canadianbennett forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
canadianbennett

Con

canadianbennett forfeited this round.
STALIN

Pro

Vote Pro!
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by WheezySquash8 3 years ago
WheezySquash8
canadianbennettSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff
Vote Placed by Swagmasterpoopoo 3 years ago
Swagmasterpoopoo
canadianbennettSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro for not forfeiting. Also, S&G to pro since Con's sentence missed a preposition. Arguments to Con since he actually said something that supported his arguments sorta. Con only said that it didn't make sense, but never explained how, so i cant really give him points for properly refuting Con
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 3 years ago
bladerunner060
canadianbennettSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: What is this I don't even..... Conduct to Pro for the forfeits. S&G because what little Con did post was nonsensical. Arguments because Pro actually showed up, and pointed out that Con was making no sense. Nobody sourced.