The Instigator
bshizzlemynizzl
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points
The Contender
quadnips
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points

should candy be illegal

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
bshizzlemynizzl
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/22/2013 Category: Arts
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,192 times Debate No: 30538
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

bshizzlemynizzl

Con

dude candy should be illegal. boom
quadnips

Pro

why tho everybody likes candy mannnnnn
Debate Round No. 1
bshizzlemynizzl

Con

its bad for your eyes
quadnips

Pro

wow wow wow wow wow wow
Debate Round No. 2
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by DjRockey 4 years ago
DjRockey
Is this a joke?
Posted by Deadlykris 4 years ago
Deadlykris
Where to begin...

First off, the argument presented for the con position is at odds with the resolution. It's unclear if he's trying to be "Con" against his own resolution or "Con" against candy itself. If the latter, which seems true from his "arguments", then he's reversed the Pro and Con positions for the debate and should have chosen the Pro position.

Second, both Pro and Con have atrocious S&G.

Third, the arguments are only called such for lack of any other term. There's no backing up of the assertions, and no proper rebuttal of anything said by either side.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by BA_BA_BA 4 years ago
BA_BA_BA
bshizzlemynizzlquadnipsTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: This is obviously an opinion debate so here is mine.
Vote Placed by Deadlykris 4 years ago
Deadlykris
bshizzlemynizzlquadnipsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: This is a facepalm-worthy debate. Let me identify all of what is wrong with it. See the comments section because a RFD only allows for a thousand characters, and I think I'll need more. 1 point to the Contender because I need to penalize someone for this debate, and that rightly should be the Instigator! That point is conduct because I can't remotely justify any other point.