The Instigator
fintheh1
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
RedSun
Con (against)
Winning
10 Points

should deez niples replace deez nuts

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
RedSun
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/2/2015 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 516 times Debate No: 80430
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)

 

fintheh1

Pro

my friend wants to know
RedSun

Con

They should not and CANNOT because "niples" isn't a real word. And "deez nuts" is a mainstream meme that was created for unintelligent and immature purposes. It shouldn't be replaced, it should be removed.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by RedSun 1 year ago
RedSun
I agree with you, PowerPikachu21.
Posted by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
... Wow. 1 Round and Pro made no arguments what so ever. He practically conceded the moment he pressed "Send Argument".
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
fintheh1RedSunTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con provides actually provides an argument.
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
fintheh1RedSunTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro is making the affirmative statement, therefore has full burden of proof. But Pro fails to provide any relevant argument. Con shows that "niples" isn't a word, therefore deconstructing the resolution to be completely meaningless. As Con shows that a meaningless resolution can't be affirmed, I presume Con and award them with the arguments points.
Vote Placed by 21MolonLabe 1 year ago
21MolonLabe
fintheh1RedSunTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I don't believe an RFD is needed. Nonetheless, S&G: Pro did not use capitalization or punctuation marks, whereas Con did. ARGUMENTS: Con is the only one to make an argument.