should euthanasia be legalised?
Debate Rounds (3)
(Only 1000? Darned!)
While my opponent has presented the singular case of 'suffering from disease', legalising euthanasia has more consequences that I am sure my opponent has not considered.
The purpose of legalizing euthanasia is to implement mercy killing, but have you ever thought about what would happen when euthanasia is actually legalized?
By legalizing euthanasia, you've given the OK for people to kill other people, for people to commit suicide. How do you know a person is suffering? Fact is : you don't . Now you and I both know of cases of incurable disease. If a person suffering from an incurable disease elects to be euthanised, I am sure we both agree that it would be justified. However, incurable diseases aren't the only agents that cause suffering!!
The main problem : euthanisation can be implemented by someone on someone else. There are then an incredibly diverse number of scenarios in which euthanisation can be abused as a way to legally murder people.
1000 characters.. REALLY??
Can help to shorten the grief and suffering of the patient"s loved ones.
Everyone has the right to decide how they should die.
Death is a private matter, and if you are not hurting anyone else, the state should not interfere.
Most people would have their pets put down if they were suffering " this would be regarded as kindness. Why can"t the same kindness be given to humans?
Illness can take away autonomy (the ability to make choices) and dignity, leaving you with no quality of life; euthanasia allows you to take back control in deciding to die
Keeping people alive costs a lot of money, which could be used to save other people's lives
How do you measure a person's suffering? How do you know someone isn't just going through a phase and will be normal again?
Let's say, for example, we had a coma patient. Now comas can last from hours, days, and years to a lifetime. The fact is, you dont know how long the coma is going to last.
Let's say a patient has been comatose for 6 months, and would have woken up the next month. The patient's family decides: 'let's euthanize him since he is 'suffering'. How do you know the coma patient is suffering? By having him euthanized, this patient, who would have been back to 'life' and fully recovered, has now been killed. I argue to pro, while optimal cases of euthanization are great for justifying it, we must consider that legalizing euthanization allows for a multitude of loopholes through which you can legally kill another person. The example I've provided is just one of many.
My opponent must address the following:
1. legal loopholes (of which there are many)
2. by what standard do we euthanize?
kananideep264_debate.org forfeited this round.
Keep this thing illegal! Thank you.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Themoderate 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||7|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.