should gay marriage be legal?
Debate Rounds (3)
those are just one logical way of seeing this whole matter. their are more at stack with this gay marriage thing, take the two gay couple out focus on society as a whole, what benefit is their? what lesson do they teach the non-gay community? what message are they transcending society? i don't see anything good coming out of this from all views. yes it might be their free will, but what about those gay couple who adopt a non gay child? what is their of that child free will? and clearly growing up without a mom and dad is already difficulty,think about growing up having a dad and a dad whose gender role in the home are not clear to the child. these gay men i do agree that they are also human being, however, do you ever think that changing in gender roles might be effecting other non-gay men as well. If society is going to accept them, i think they should be wearing a head band that state their status, because then it otherwise it would be unfair to non-gay men being in the same bathroom as a gay men, and so many other laws have to be made to abide these people.
YOU ARE ONE EXAMPLE, YOUR MOM AND DAD GIVE YOU LIFE, NOT YOUR DAD AND DAD. A study shows that female have a very strong emotions for their child then the dad does. meaning no matter how hard a guy treys to be like a women he will never achieve that goal. that child will never know what it to have a mom, whose voice are calming, who always treys to make life the absolute best for you, guys lack most caring quality that females have,and that side of a mother is very important to a child when growing up. I am not sure about this study you are talking about, but before you start relying on some doctors work. Know that its not completely accurate, did that study follow the young child who was raise with gay men for more then fifty years? and how many young boys? does it also include young boys from different part of the world other then the western part? and even if the study does include all of the above, humans are unpredictable, what might work for one child might not work for millions of chilled.
you said if these gay men were wearing a headband stating their status it would encourage harassment? well how would they rather have this? they want to stand out of society,but yet they don't want to be distinguish, because it is clear that a gay men wants people to know that hes gay, he just don't want people criticizing him, so wouldn't it be nice knowing whose gay and whose not? in that case you know how to treat them according to their right? they cannot avoid these harassment, why? Because the majority of the world see their status as misguided, i'm trying not insult anyone.
later you also said that the government should not rule this nation base on religion. well careful their, because i believe these religious people are also part of this nations,and yes their view are just as important as any other views, weather political or not.
We could educate our children about how some people are attracted to the same sex(not everyone) and that its ok.
"it does not make any sense why a men would want to sleep with another men."
Its pretty simple, its the same reason you want to sleep with a women, because they're attracted to them.
" A study shows that female have a very strong emotions for their child then the dad does. meaning no matter how hard a guy treys to be like a women he will never achieve that goal. that child will never know what it to have a mom, whose voice are calming, who always treys to make life the absolute best for you, guys lack most caring quality that females have,and that side of a mother is very important to a child when growing up."
My opponent failed to cite this study, therefore this is not a valid point.
" they want to stand out of society,"
In this point my opponent shows his complete ignorance on the topic. They don't want to stand out they want to be accepted, and to fit in.
"later you also said that the government should not rule this nation base on religion. well careful their, because I believe these religious people are also part of this nations,and yes their view are just as important as any other views, weather political or not."
Well actually the bill of rights says in article 1 "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" so congress cannot support political views with a religious base.
Throughout the entire debate my opponent used invalid generalizations to support his case. Nearly all of his points were easily refutable, and he showed no valid evidence. Id like to remind you that the supreme court has already ruled (Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur) "freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause" (-quote from supreme court ruling). This ruling specifically states that we have the freedom of personal choice in matters of MARRIAGE and family. Although my opponent believes this isn't applicable, it clearly is. This is why I believe you should vote pro.
Timeworn forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by imabench 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con spent most of his arguments speaking through is own opinions, half of which arent even logical arguments, before simply forfeiting the final round. Pro's arguments for Gay Marriage werent the best, btu they were more then good enough to be better then Con's, so arguments and conduct to her
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.