The Instigator
shashankmelkote30
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Preston
Con (against)
Winning
22 Points

should girl shild be educated??

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Preston
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/15/2014 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 973 times Debate No: 58992
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (15)
Votes (5)

 

shashankmelkote30

Pro

should girl children be educated?
Preston

Con

yes, but girl shilds should not becuase they arent a real thing. So for that matter boy shilds shouldn't either.
Debate Round No. 1
shashankmelkote30

Pro

shashankmelkote30 forfeited this round.
Preston

Con

um... well ill wait for my opponent
Debate Round No. 2
shashankmelkote30

Pro

shashankmelkote30 forfeited this round.
Preston

Con

well... GG vote CON
Debate Round No. 3
15 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by espionopinion 2 years ago
espionopinion
Girls should be able to be educated. if women/girls are educated they can be more of use regarding, careers.
Posted by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
haha ill look at this definition next post
Posted by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
The way to defeat semantics is to not accept them. Anything not defined by the instigator in the first round, is only restricted by English common usage. All con has done is done a playful acceptance round.

As for what a shild is, it is actually not in common useage, but http://en.wiktionary.org...

It does indeed exist, but to talk of special girl shilds sounds a lot like "I bought you dinner girl, you better put out, it's your shild." Which the idea of educating girls on having such shilds seems obscene, but pro may present any case they wish and I will judge it fairly.
Posted by Usef 2 years ago
Usef
lol, how is anyone going to seriously argue against girls being educated. Unless they against argue the type of education girls are receiving.
Posted by rings48 2 years ago
rings48
Pssh elo rankings. What is more important is being a pain in the butt.

"You didn't define God so I am defining god based on the zorastinain God. Your opinion on ID has no sources that are relevant to your God."
Posted by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
haha, if i remember i will
Posted by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
Someone let me know when this goes into the voting period.
Posted by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
Bam I win, shilds aren't real
Posted by knight.j 2 years ago
knight.j
You think we're going to accept the Con position? It would probably make us one of the most hated people on debate.org.
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 2 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood
This is probably from or regarding a country that has been oppressive to women like many or most of the Muslim nations are. Of course girls should be educated and have equal treatment as boys.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Daltonian 2 years ago
Daltonian
shashankmelkote30PrestonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: No one really made an argument. Conduct to Con for ff. S&G also to con for the existence of "shild" in a sentence. I sent my shild to school. I love shildren.
Vote Placed by QandA 2 years ago
QandA
shashankmelkote30PrestonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Never thought I'd vote for the con stance in this type of debate however Pro's forfeiture leaves me no choice.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
shashankmelkote30PrestonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: HOW TO VOTE... Conduct for forfeitures. S&G tied as there was not enough words for any deficiency to distract from arguments. Arguments are by default tied, pro cannot win them as he lacks even a single contention on this; however I found con's case against the resolution to be of greater merit and supported by logic. Sources are also tied, as without evidence presented neither can win this. ... EXTRA NOTE (by including this, my vote could be reported; I would then have to resubmit it with argument points removed), a shild actually does exist (pro did not point this out, so it can't move the vote to his favor). A shild is a synonym for "guilt, sin, crime, offence, fault, debt, due, obligation, liability" thus teaching of special girl shilds is messed up in a Blurred Lines/Legitimate Rape kind of way.
Vote Placed by rings48 2 years ago
rings48
shashankmelkote30PrestonTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con adequately questions whether any shilds should ever been educated. He is somewhat a racist in his accusations but is able to rebuttal Pro's arguments.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
shashankmelkote30PrestonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture