The Instigator
typo
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
mdc32
Con (against)
Winning
16 Points

should guns be alowed

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
mdc32
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/27/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 534 times Debate No: 64021
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

typo

Pro

guns should be allowed in all of the us!!!!!
mdc32

Con

I would like to accept this debate. Just as a heads up, I might not be able to submit next round's argument. However, this round will be as strong as possible in the time allotted.

Guns should not be allowed in all of the US. For example, prison cells. No prisoner should have the right to a gun, as he will surely misuse it and probably kill someone else. Also, guns should not be allowed in the care of minors, such as day care or a school environment. Children will likely fire a gun accidentally and possibly even kill someone.

Another place where guns should not be allowed is in the hands of visitors to the White House. Would the death of our president be beneficial to anyone? No. One of the final places guns should be banned is in an office of a high-ranking official. If the CEO of a major company such as Apple, Google, or Microsoft was murdered, many people would protest the use of guns everywhere in the United States.

I am anxious to see my opponents response to this round of arguments. Thanks for reading.
Debate Round No. 1
typo

Pro

I am sorry let me re word that

all guns should be legal to the public such as
rifles
semiautomatic rifles
automatic rifles
handguns
shotguns
and so on should all be allowed to the public.
mdc32

Con

Pro changed his arguments and didn't rebut me at all. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 2
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Zanomi3 2 years ago
Zanomi3
@cheyennebodie

Why don't you post all of these comments in the forums or opinions section? It sure seems that you are completely biased and at times stuck in the past, not accepting that times are changing. If you have an opinion that needs to be stated on basically every single debate that gets posted, spend your time filling out comments in the opinions section of the website instead of posting your opinion on the debates. You'll probably get better arguments there.
Posted by cheyennebodie 2 years ago
cheyennebodie
How about banning gun free zones. The constitution already does.As I have noticed. Schools are the very place where guns should be in the hands of the good guys. Because the absence of guns by good guys has caused a lot of dead children.
Posted by kevin24018 2 years ago
kevin24018
they are all legal already, yes even fully automatic, you have to apply for a licence but they are legal., so there is no debate here, sorry
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by PillarOfSalt 2 years ago
PillarOfSalt
typomdc32Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro is dumb
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
typomdc32Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: pro changed the debate so conduct to con. His spelling was horrid so that point to con. Con's arguments were unrebuted so arg's to con.
Vote Placed by Zanomi3 2 years ago
Zanomi3
typomdc32Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con because Pro changed his arguments halfway into the debate. Arguments also to Con because his statements went unrefuted throughout the course of the two round debate. Sources are even because neither used any, as well as spelling and grammar (no major mistakes from either).