The Instigator
ooollaaalaaa
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
PatriotPerson
Pro (for)
Winning
14 Points

should h.w. be banned

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
PatriotPerson
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/12/2013 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,002 times Debate No: 36616
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

ooollaaalaaa

Con

every student thinks that homework should be banned its true because h.w. is disturbing the students. students are coming home with lot of heavy weight at their shoulders. then they rest eat food go for tution classes and come back with tution h.w. there is lot to do teachers are giving school h.w. tution teacher are also giving tution h.w. students are disapointed so i think h.w. should be banned all h.w. should be done in school .
PatriotPerson

Pro

My opponent has gotten the sides mixed up--instead of taking pro as he believes, he took Con. To clarify, he does not want homework. I do.

I think homework should not be banned because it is useful to the students. Con (Pro) may now make his first argument.
Debate Round No. 1
ooollaaalaaa

Con

ooollaaalaaa forfeited this round.
PatriotPerson

Pro

PatriotPerson forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
ooollaaalaaa

Con

ooollaaalaaa forfeited this round.
PatriotPerson

Pro

Haha weeeee
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Homosapien 3 years ago
Homosapien
Then you need to be on the Pro side - asserting HW should be banned, the con would suggest HW shouldn't be banned.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by dwmiller 3 years ago
dwmiller
ooollaaalaaaPatriotPersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Poor debate. Both sides were arguing the wrong sides of their debate; therefore, no points awarded for arguments. Conduct pt goes to pro as con had more FF. S/G pt goes to pro as con could use some homework in spelling.
Vote Placed by orangemayhem 3 years ago
orangemayhem
ooollaaalaaaPatriotPersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Wow, this got confusing... Conduct tied as each side forfeited at least one round, so nobody had a leg to stand on as far as that point is concerned. S/G goes to Pro for actually writing coherently. Arguments to Pro for arguing the correct side of the debate. No sources used.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
ooollaaalaaaPatriotPersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: *snore* ARGUMENT: Con did not make one, and had the sides confused.
Vote Placed by ModusTollens 3 years ago
ModusTollens
ooollaaalaaaPatriotPersonTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit, confused role, and grammar very much in need of some homework conspired agains "Con" here.