should halo be bumped down on the rating system from M to T
Debate Rounds (3)
I think it should for
1 halo has no sexual references and no drugs or suggestive themes
2 unlike COD in halo there is only mild swearing and although the blood level is high some games I've seen have more Gore (COD)
I wait for the counter argument for this topic.
Firstly, although all the Halo games have little or no sexual references or drugs, the main focus of rating it M15 is an intention that so Xbox players can choose something that's mature and challenging and within their gaming level (e.g. violence, sci fi, etc...). This rating is not entirely based on how much gore or blood there is, but is in fact what it should be played by for the experience. The concept of the Halo series is a hard one to grasp and requires a decent level of understanding, so as to be safe they have to rate it M15.
Secondly, even though there is less swearing, blood violence and other aspects compared to Call of Duty, it still falls under the category of mature audiences regardless of how much there is.
As implied before, the target market is those aged 15 and above meaning that it is intentional but not necessary. The point of ratings is to set it in a generalised age group of what the producers think would be appropriate. I'm not saying children can't play, but the generalised idea of children under 15 is that violence, blood/gore and guns are still inappropriate to them, despite if a child has completed the game or not.
" I've also played a game with more swearing and mature situations that was teen."
- You need to back up that idea with evidence, but all I can say is that there may be other suggestive themes in Halo that put it in M15.
Blood, swearing, and violence. Halo is M for Blood and violence.
"But my entire point is that so many people under 15 play halo that ESRB should lower the rating because it doesn't matter if it is M"
- As I pointed out before, the rating used for target marketing. Children under 15 aren't restricted to playing Halo or any other games, it's just not entirely intended for them. Also, parents may care for what thier child is playing, and you're saying that it doesn't matter what the rating of a particular game is because 'so many' people play it, but it may be a concern for parents because of influences or suggestive themes. That's another reason why appropriate ratings are important, and in the case of Halo as you mentioned above, it has a degree of blood and violence.
In the point of the game you're mentioning, the traits might be restricted down enough to fall in the rating T, so as to target young gamers, but it still doesn't relate to why Halo should be rated lower.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by LibertarianWithAVoice 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: I really liked the debate. I thought The-Red-Outlaw won but I know you will get better masterchief.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.