The Instigator
galien1
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Con (against)
Winning
16 Points

should kids have more time to eat in school

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/9/2015 Category: Health
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 612 times Debate No: 69725
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

galien1

Pro

kids should get mare time to eat at lunch
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Con

I accept this debate and I'd like to wish my opponent good luck. :)
Debate Round No. 1
galien1

Pro

galien1 forfeited this round.
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Con

My opponent has forfeited his turn. Because he has the burden to prove the resolution, and he failed to bring up a case there is no choice to vote affirmative.
Debate Round No. 2
galien1

Pro

galien1 forfeited this round.
SPENCERJOYAGE14

Con

And, vote for me please.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by ResponsiblyIrresponsible 2 years ago
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Mare - "the female of a horse or other equine animal."

Says Pro, "kids should get mare time to eat at lunch."

Female horse time to eat at lunch?!?! Non comprendo senor.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by TheAdamb99 2 years ago
TheAdamb99
galien1SPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Self-explanatory...pro did not debate at all.
Vote Placed by ResponsiblyIrresponsible 2 years ago
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
galien1SPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: PRO forfeited every round and thus could not fulfill his BOP, so CON wins arguments as well as conduct. Further, CON, I think you inadvertently said "vote to affirm" in Round 2. I'm sure you don't want that, nor is there any rational, objective reason for anyone to do that ;)
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
galien1SPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by NiamC 2 years ago
NiamC
galien1SPENCERJOYAGE14Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to con, pro forfeited. No arguments nor bop produced by pro.