The Instigator
oliverpuck
Con (against)
Winning
12 Points
The Contender
bryman
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points

should mitt romeny be the next president of the united states

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
oliverpuck
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/25/2012 Category: Politics
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,106 times Debate No: 26582
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (5)

 

oliverpuck

Con

hello weird kid down the street I chalenge you to this debate
bryman

Pro

I think he will. Oboma has lied many time in the debate and should not get away with it. also he said he would help the contry but made it wors. I think that people have lernd a leson and will not vote for him agan. Now I know you dont like romnys idea for the military but thats one thing and obama has done wors
Debate Round No. 1
oliverpuck

Con

my opponent has said a poor argument he fails to state any of obamas mistakes and has failed to say what obama has done worse than mitt romeny at millatary defence if you think that chaching osama bin laden is a bad thing. thenn that is a relevent arguement cause president barack obama has done a very good job in my opinon he has done the one thing that we went to afganastan for to take care of bin laden. now one might say that mitt romeny is puting lots of money into millatary but obama is puting his money into tech well mitt romeny can put all the money he wants and just by banetts but that wont inprove our milatary we need better tech to do this so ounce agiain I tell you vote con
bryman

Pro

Now I think you miss juged me I think it is a good thig osama is dead
Debate Round No. 2
oliverpuck

Con

sorry if I misjudged you but I am just saying that president obama has done good things to
bryman

Pro

now Im not good vote for who you think won
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Luggs 4 years ago
Luggs
Probably the same guy.
Posted by TheElderScroll 4 years ago
TheElderScroll
Is the military issue the only thing factor in determining who should be the next President?
Posted by Metalbutter 4 years ago
Metalbutter
Haha, agree!----V
Posted by Like_a_Boss 4 years ago
Like_a_Boss
This seems like a debate between 2 hillbillies who never learned how to type or speak with this magical thing called grammer.
Posted by emj32 4 years ago
emj32
These kind of debates always make me laugh..
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by philochristos 4 years ago
philochristos
oliverpuckbrymanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro obviously has the superior case. He pointed out that Oboma made the contry wors, and all Con could come up with was that chaching osama fulfilled the one purpose for which our military went to afganastan.
Vote Placed by shuffledybot 4 years ago
shuffledybot
oliverpuckbrymanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: con never made any arguments, he just rebuttled the Pro. Also this isnt really a debate, half of the rounds are like 10 words long. also you two need to learn to spell, REAL quick.
Vote Placed by Muted 4 years ago
Muted
oliverpuckbrymanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: What Billdekel said. Both should get point deductions for bad grammar, if that was possible.
Vote Placed by Billdekel 4 years ago
Billdekel
oliverpuckbrymanTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Con is the only one who really made any arguments.
Vote Placed by Like_a_Boss 4 years ago
Like_a_Boss
oliverpuckbrymanTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Both of them sucked but I agree with Con.