should not true stories be aloud in articles
Debate Rounds (3)
I accept! Untrue stories should be allowed in articles!
Dude... This is a debate... Debate!
There are several reasons why untrue stories should be allowed in articles.
1. If we did not allow untrue articles, how would we enforce it?
2. If we did not allow untrue articles, who would decide what articles are untrue?
3. If we did not allow untrue articles, that abridgement of the 1st ammendment might be used as precedent for future precedent for further violation.
terry50 forfeited this round.
Kumquatodor forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by wiploc 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Grammar: Con didn't capitalize, punctuate, or spell, plus the resolution was incoherent. Only Pro's clarification allowed me to understand what was being debated. Conduct: Con initiated a debate with no intention of debating, and Con was the first to forfeit. Persuasion: Con had the burden of proof, but he never tried to support his claim. He repeated his claim, but he never argued in defense of it.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.