The Instigator
deabteking
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
mee2kool4u369
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

should schools teach swag

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
mee2kool4u369
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/14/2013 Category: Education
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 774 times Debate No: 36686
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

deabteking

Pro

I believe that they should teach it so kids could learn how not to get beat up in the real world. Also if the number of swag rises then there will be more gangs and more gangs means more drugs and the drugs will help the economy.
mee2kool4u369

Con

Hello

Sorry but, you are completely wrong. Schools should not teach "swag". You even put yourself down by saying that there will be more gangs. As if there are not already enough gangs. Here is my first reason why schools should not teach swag:

1. You say that kids won't get beat up. WRONG! You watch way too many movies. Getting beat up does not necessarily mean that you are cool or not. It could have nothing to do with that like maybe the bully has issues at home and is trying to take it out on someone.

Schools teaching swag. That's funny. And you said more gangs that sell drugs. I know you know that those "drugs" you are talking about are illegal and that means the government would just be hurting themselves. Government schools to students to have "swag"> Students form gangs> Gangs sell drugs> selling illegal drugs hurts the country.

You should think before you post your next argument because your first one was horrible.
Debate Round No. 1
deabteking

Pro

deabteking forfeited this round.
mee2kool4u369

Con

A rest my case.
Debate Round No. 2
deabteking

Pro

deabteking forfeited this round.
mee2kool4u369

Con

mee2kool4u369 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 4 years ago
KingDebater
deabtekingmee2kool4u369Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to con because pro forfeited one more time than con and arguments to con because he had arguments and they weren't refuted, however pro's arguments were refuted.