The Instigator
Mr.burgerton
Pro (for)
Tied
3 Points
The Contender
baus
Con (against)
Tied
3 Points

should the statue of liberty be saved?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/29/2014 Category: Places-Travel
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 790 times Debate No: 55664
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

Mr.burgerton

Pro

it should because it is a symbol of freedom when the immigrants came here from other parts of the world because they felt free from their rulers that forced them to do stuff
baus

Con

There is no reason to save a statue that has long expired its original purpose of use.

It may well be a tourist attraction and generate a lot of revenue but it does not need saving.

It cannot be killed, it can only be destroy and if it did get destroyed you couldn't save it in the first place. You could only rebuild it.
Debate Round No. 1
Mr.burgerton

Pro

Mr.burgerton forfeited this round.
baus

Con

baus forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Mr.burgerton

Pro

Mr.burgerton forfeited this round.
baus

Con

baus forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Mr.burgerton

Pro

Mr.burgerton forfeited this round.
baus

Con

baus forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Mr.burgerton

Pro

Mr.burgerton forfeited this round.
baus

Con

baus forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by dairygirl4u2c 2 years ago
dairygirl4u2c
not sure how you could be anti saving the statute of liberty, but there's always a schmuck to take issue with anything. we'll see.
Posted by ArcTImes 2 years ago
ArcTImes
From the immigrants lol. jk
Posted by doomswatter 2 years ago
doomswatter
Saved from what?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by pensfan 2 years ago
pensfan
Mr.burgertonbausTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: not that good of a debate. I agreed with pro before and after the argument. but con had better grammar.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
Mr.burgertonbausTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments to pro. Conduct and S&G to con.