The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

should we be allowed to use ipods durind school for music

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/17/2013 Category: Music
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,494 times Debate No: 37824
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (1)




yes we should be allowed to because studies show that it helps some kids work better. if you cant work with music the don't use it but if you can try it and prove that you can get better grades while you should be allowed.


I accept this debate. I will be arguing that iPods should not be used for music in school. I thank my opponent for the opportunity.

The fact of the matter is that electronics of all sort are a distraction in school. iPods are not just used for music.

There are also the problems that arise from stolen property. Tension, fighting, suspicions, and again, the overall distraction in the school. This can certainly affect student performance.

Finally, there has been a general movement to make schooling more and more personally situated to each student's "needs". While this might be an ideal situation, the fact of the matter is that schools must operate on aiding the highest number of students. I don't believe the smorgasbord approach does this. It adds confusion and allows students to hide behind "preferences" instead of being challenged to complete in the current situation.

This also promulgates an attitude of anarchy which overflows in the workplace and lowers overall productivity in the economy. Who wants an employee that needs their every whim satisfied before they can do their job every day? No one that intends on making a profit, certainly.
Debate Round No. 1


I think that they should because it helps some people and in the recent Olympics there was swimmers and others listing to their music before they perform . just like all people study different everyone learns differently. And for some people music helps them think better. you should be allowed to use music during non instructional time.


We are debating whether or not to allow iPods in school to listen to music. I do not think that we should because they create distractions, they can create problems by being stolen, and finally I believe that the attitude that everyone should learn with their own methods is extremely inefficient and impractical as a schooling program.

My opponent made an argument that infers since Olympic swimmers use music prior to performing that students in school should be allowed to use iPods. There are two issues with this argument:
1. They are Olympic swimmers. Dedication and drive are inherent to their successes. They"ve already demonstrated their self discipline in their rigorous training and eating habits as well as long term commitment. One would not get such sureties from the average student.[1]
2. The Olympic swimmers listened to music prior to performing, not during practice or performance.

iPods are distracting by their very design. They dont just have music capabilities. They have games, video, and cameras, along with a near unlimited number of apps for download.[2][3] One cannot candidly expect students not to indulge in such distractions to the detriment of their schooling.

Along with this is the fact that these features open students up to more serious forms of distraction. Young people have been known to take and pass along lewd pictures and video. This is often discovered in school as they share these images back and forth and the children end up charged with charges for having or spreading child pornography.[4]

Electronics can be stolen. There are rates of nearly ten students per every thousand that experiencing theft in a single school year. It's to be noted that those reports are based on thefts of items over $10.[5]

The natural reaction to theft is anger, frustration, helplessness and sometimes vengeance. These are all distracting and often troublesome emotions for groups to experience. It would be detrimental to a school environment for children to experience this. As electronics become more commonplace, so would the theft of those devices, and the suspicions attached to them. It would be better if electronics were completely banned from school grounds.

Finally, schools are institutions. Most often, they are public institutions, run by tax payer funding and government bureaucracy. Institutions require funding and staff. The reason schools are directed as they are is because they must educate large numbers of children and so variation must be restricted because there is no proper way to assess children with a sundry and varied approach to training without a huge, inefficient staff that would require a budget that is not even possible much less practical.

Also, what is the intent of schooling? Is it to push every child through? Or is it to teach those that can be taught for future careers and to assess the others" weaknesses to send them to other trades where they are more suited? Not everyone is going to be a rocket scientist. I don"t believe that sacrificing the core group for those that can"t fit the mold makes any sense. It would be more helpful to identify those and put them into trade schools or otherwise.

I had also mentioned that to teach every child to their specific pleasure will lead to an attitude that requires personal preferences to be met before any effort can be gotten out of individuals.

Schooling doesn't just teach facts and figures. It gives an impression of society and our position in it. If students are allowed to pick and choose every day how they want to meet the day, what use are they as employees. What if they decide they can't work until after eight, while everyone else shows up at six? What if they decide they need their music when safety requires earplugs? How will they function if the world is bent around them? It will certainly not bend so well once they get out of school and head into the "real world".

iPods are not conducive to a strong learning environment. They cause distractions. The argument that school should be fit to each and every student is not practical nor is it to be desired. Schooling serves more purposes than just learning. It conditions people to accept the rules and regulations and inconveniences of life. As such, I do not believe that iPods should be allowed in schools.

Debate Round No. 2


we shold be allowed because you cant go on inter net or text if you dont have the wi-fi password and the teachers would watch you while you do work and stuff


Pro attempts to bring in the fact that the internet and texting are cut off suggesting that this limits distractions on the iPod. While this may be the case to a point, it still doesn't speak to the several abilities inherent to the iPod previously discussed, such as videos, games, and pictures.

Neither has Pro even approached my other arguments and as such, they stand.

The iPod is a distraction in school. It (and all electronics) should be banned in schools because they degrade the learning experience and provide minimal benefit.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Anonymous1122 3 years ago
they cant be two distracting if you have ear buds in
Posted by Naysayer 3 years ago
I wish someone would quit whining about someone else's debate. It's called acceptance round.
Posted by devin.cooper64 3 years ago
I wish someone in this debate would use evidence instead of empty claims :/
Posted by Sleezehead 3 years ago
I go to an online-based school in Claysville, Alabama. It is called Lakeside Academy. I can attest that using computers and laptops is a much more efficient and affective teaching method.
Posted by Ragnar 3 years ago
Not going to step on a noob... But MP3 players are distracting to other people in the class.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Rational_Thinker9119 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument was that music can help some people. However, Con mentioned that iPods can be a distraction as well. Con was more convincing in his arguments for many reasons. For one, there are many things one can do with an iPod. If one allowed iPods for music, there is a good chance that this would get abused. Also, many times iPods can get stolen, which is even more of a distraction....Arguments to Con.