The Instigator
seflopez
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcb
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

should we be aloud to have 12 hours of no law

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/24/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 462 times Debate No: 44534
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

seflopez

Con

I think that no we should not have this because either way it still leads to violence and some people who do not want to be involved because there could be possibly no where safe people but also there is another thing that is that shops markets and things like that will be distorted and we will soon end up with nothing well thank you for taking your time in reading this
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcb

Pro

There is a movie where this exact thing occurs annually. (I am legally obligated not to paste the entire movie as a link but do make sure to watch it, it's not that great as a movie but for what it reveals about human nature, it's fantastic).

Humans have a natural capacity for aggression, a natural lust for boundless pleasure and a natural urge to feel anxiety. (http://dynamishealthcentre.com...) The urge for anxiety can surely be doused by going to expensive theme parks or watching expensive horror movies, the urge for boundless pleasure can come to the rich too but what can those seeking to unleash their aggression do? Not everyone's a professional dominatrix. Aggression is the one thing that, no matter how rich a person is, how powerful they become, or how much they train, a person can release to their fullest extent without legal backlash of some kind (or in the case of the most carnal of fighters, a severe damage to their publicity and career). Humans will inevitably,, unless professional fighters, build up an amount of hate and turmoil over time that they have to release in some way and all year round we see it; pent up anger being unleashed on the world. It's not just anger though, it's lust (rape), greed (theft), envy (damage to property or killing off those better off than you in some way). There are the homeless on the street, day after day draining the economy, there are the elderly and disabled living a life no person would wish to endure and draining hard earned cash that no working person wishes to have taken from them. These people must be eradicated, but not all year round in an anarchic manner. They must be given an annual deadline to motivate some to get into a better position by the next annual purge. If they fail to find such motivation then too bad; they will be killed (unless they are charming, or lucky, enough to get away with it). This is natural selection and it is what made our ancestors survive to give birth to us, we must uphold their values and respect them.

If you are too stupid to protect yourself during the purge, you die. If you are too fat, or weak, to get away fast enough during the purge, you die. If you have such a social ineptitude that even those you live with have decided they want you gone; you will die. Sure, some will go more painfully than others but all in all, it is natural selection at its finest. We kill off the wastes of space and leave only the finest of our species, thus only the finest will reproduce for the next year, until next year when the next lot of defective human beings are killed off once again.

This is natural and beautiful and will ensure that for the rest of the year people find it much easier to control themselves for this 12-hour period. Thus, the crime rate of the entire nation will severely decrease overall.

Thank you for your understanding,
Help this wonderful nation,
Enjoy the purge.
Debate Round No. 1
seflopez

Con

seflopez forfeited this round.
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcb

Pro

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcb forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
seflopez

Con

seflopez forfeited this round.
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcb

Pro

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcb forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Jingram994 3 years ago
Jingram994
I agree with Romanii. The laws themselves exist for a reason; simply removing them does not actually 'address' any potential issues with the laws, nor any of the issues that the laws were actually put in place to address. Removing all laws relating to something will only 'lower the crime rate' inasmuch as it is no longer illegal for that thing to occur; if murder was legal for 12 hours a year, the murder rate for the rest of the year would almost certainly see minimal if any change, and there would be an enormous jump in death rate in that 12 hour period, which would adversely affect a huge number of individuals as well as those who are actually killed, and society itself. Also, it would then be up to society to clean up the massive mess this period of lawlessness would inevitably leave.
Posted by Romanii 3 years ago
Romanii
Who the hell would accept this?
The most I would be comfortable allowing is about 10 seconds of no law...
No votes have been placed for this debate.