should we exterminate white people
Debate Rounds (3)
It is true that "whites" are "meaner" to "blacks".
Why am I using quotation marks on the words, "whites" and "blacks?"
This is because genetically, there is not a single difference. It is just skin color.
If you think about it, and/or research it, if a white person stayed in Africa or near the Equator for some amount of time, his/her skin would grow darker. After one or two generations, the grandchildren of the first white person would have completely dark skin and would be unrecognizable from a black.
Interesting isn't it?
If you decided to "eliminate all whites," you would have to kill off every single person on Earth.
I really don't think you'd want to do that.
However, the debate is about whether we should kill off all the whites, not to kill off everyone on the planet. I do not want to do that.
Actually, the white people don't cause other people's deaths, its the other way around. Other people start getting aggressive and start wars, and then the white people have to shut those people down. Though it is true the white people end up killing a lot of other people, those people really brought it upon themselves didn't they?
Also, most white people don't like killing others. This causes the white people great grief to kill anyone. (that includes me even though I'm Asian.)
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Balacafa 11 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Con objectively wins this debate. Pro argued off topic and ended up shifting the resolution and advocating the termination of everyone on the planet. This was used in the round for rebuttals and therefore con's argument was left uncontested. This means that con meets his BOP and con doesn't because he failed to debate the resolution being discussed.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.