The Instigator
safere.garcia
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Wylted
Pro (for)
Winning
14 Points

should we have balls or not

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Wylted
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/13/2015 Category: Health
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 379 times Debate No: 82508
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)

 

safere.garcia

Con

lhucyrtkfugilh;jok'POJihug;yflcg
Wylted

Pro

We should have balls. They help regulate the temperature of sperm, keeping them at an appropriate temperature to be fertile. The balls hang outside of the body to keep the speed cooler. When it is cold out side they shrivel up to warm the sperm, when hot outside they hang lower in an attempt to be cooler. Without balls, we'd all be infertile, so we do need them. Thanks http://blogs.scientificamerican.com...
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by JernHenrik 1 year ago
JernHenrik
yes balls are a good thing
keep them
Posted by safere.garcia 1 year ago
safere.garcia
hi
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
safere.garciaWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro cited as a source to support his argument; Con did not.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
safere.garciaWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con just spams the the debate while Pro actually makes an argument and uses a source in the process.
Vote Placed by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
safere.garciaWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't even attempt to argue (or write an actual word) which is disrespectful to pro, so conduct to pro. Con didn't use actual words which seriously harmed his portion f the argument. S&G to pro. Con didn't present an argument at all, and pro at least provided the purpose of balls explaining their necessity while also citing a source. So arguments and sources to pro.