The Instigator
securitytttt
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Kreakin
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

should we stop testing on LIVE pets shuch as dogs rabits ECT?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Kreakin
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/27/2013 Category: Science
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 528 times Debate No: 43002
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)

 

securitytttt

Pro

Our Government is testing on pets such as rabbits dogs primates who knows what ells. i think they should stop along with universities, schools of all sorts in all grades. you WOULD think they torture thousands of animals its about time they have the information they need on how to help humans and how to help animals alike.

THEY SHOULD STOP NOW
Kreakin

Con

I accept & look forwards to an interesting debate.

I will start be saying I disagree as animal testing saves human lives.
Debate Round No. 1
securitytttt

Pro

securitytttt forfeited this round.
Kreakin

Con

Awaiting reply, I assume my argument has won this debate as no rebuttal is offered.
Debate Round No. 2
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Kreakin 3 years ago
Kreakin
Please vote for Con as pro forfeited!

Thank you!
Posted by Kreakin 3 years ago
Kreakin
Could you rephrase your resolution please?
Scoring includes use of grammar.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
Ragnar
securityttttKreakinTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit is plain rude... This is however a case where con should have started in the first round, so both could refute the others case.
Vote Placed by whiteflame 3 years ago
whiteflame
securityttttKreakinTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Yup. Forfeit.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
securityttttKreakinTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.