The Instigator
kunal1011
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
NiqashMotawadi3
Pro (for)
Winning
5 Points

social networking under 18 age should be or not

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
NiqashMotawadi3
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/11/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 627 times Debate No: 38767
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

kunal1011

Con

i am against ths
NiqashMotawadi3

Pro

I'm with allowing teenagers(13 and above) to use social networking websites.

I await Con's arguments and wish him the best of luck.
Debate Round No. 1
kunal1011

Con

kunal1011 forfeited this round.
NiqashMotawadi3

Pro

It's a forfeit, unfortunately. I'm going to make my points, regardless.

1- Social Networking is a great tool for sharing information(e.g from scientific pages)which could be very helpful to the teenagers.

2- Social Networking websites provide good means of communication for the students.

3- Major Social Networks have good censorship that protects children from harmful data.

4- DDO is a Social Network which contains many bright young debaters who are below 18, and yet have a high level of sociability, intelligence and friendliness. Forcing them not to be here because of their age would be an utter shame.
Debate Round No. 2
kunal1011

Con

kunal1011 forfeited this round.
NiqashMotawadi3

Pro

I extend my points.
Debate Round No. 3
kunal1011

Con

kunal1011 forfeited this round.
NiqashMotawadi3

Pro

I extend my points.
Debate Round No. 4
kunal1011

Con

kunal1011 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by devin.cooper64 3 years ago
devin.cooper64
This debate makes no sense.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by FourthsCharter 3 years ago
FourthsCharter
kunal1011NiqashMotawadi3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was the only one who put forth any sort of argument. The decision here was easy.