The Instigator
Islaynubs
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Alister_Illustratum
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

stop people from killing cats

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Alister_Illustratum
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/14/2017 Category: People
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 442 times Debate No: 101963
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

Islaynubs

Pro

i hate it when people hurt these sweet cats
Alister_Illustratum

Con

Stopping people from killing cats may as well be stopping them from killing... well. anything. May countries consume cats and other various animals and even have cat farms similar to cow and pig farms. Preventing people from killing these cats would drive many into hard times as cats are often what they have for meals, similar to the American Ham and cheese sandwich or PB&J. The killing of cats should and can not stop. The torturing and or cruel killings of cats are all ready illegal in the US. So anything that would come from voting AFF would only be bad, such as overpopulation and starvation. Where as the NEG supports that people be allowed to eat the meat that is readily available. Thank you..
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
If you change the debate to where rfd is required, I'll debate you.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
IslaynubsAlister_IllustratumTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Reasons for voting aren't required here. Therefore, I default to voting how I see fit. But because I do see fit, here's my RFD: 1 Round debates are horrible. The Contender wins 80% of 1 Round debates, since there's no rebuttals coming from the Instigator. Con points out that cats are a common diet in some countries, justifying the slaughter of cats. S&G to Con, since only he had professional grammar.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
IslaynubsAlister_IllustratumTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03