student should leave school at 9th grade and work
Debate Rounds (3)
"and also the earlier they learn, the faster they get into the situation"
This is confusing. The earlier they learn the faster they get into the situation? What situation? And how can they start learning earlier? In order for students to be successful in life they must go to school and get a degree. If all students only went to school till the 9th grade we would have no real professions. No doctors,lawyers, professors, scientists, none of that. Now, students can dropout once they are 16 years of age (in Florida), but if they choose not to they can go on and be successful. You are saying that there should be no colleges and that after the 9th grade students start working and they receive no further education. The absurdity is mind-blowing. America would fall apart if we did such a thing.
you havent give some point but just countering my point, so i will try to accept what you say.
This is an invalid statement. First off, you have cited no sources or even listed what countries. Also,I could almost guarantee that those countries are VERY unsuccessful. This proves absolutely nothing.
"you also argued that there will be no profession, however I don't think so, more learning doesn't mean that you are good that thing, and profession is important, and profession comes from your passion, not what you mommy says."
Despite the immaturity shown I will still rebuttal this statement. Just because you THINK something doesn't mean it's a valid argument. There needs to be documentation and sources on why you believe this, which was not provided. Professions comes from intelligent within you, not pure passion. You may however, have passion to study and want to learn in order to be successful, however they way Pro worded it I do not think he meant that.
"you havent give some point but just countering my point, so i will try to accept what you say."
It is your duty to convince the voters why we should allow such acts and it is my duty to counter what you say in order to persuade them. I feel I have fulfilled my duty and wish the voters luck.
Thank you for this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Dennybug 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||6|
Reasons for voting decision: Con clearly was leading this, Pro didn't properly back up his arguments or refute any of cons claims simply went on to make opinions. Pro gets conduct because con was lazy the first round and used a passive aggressive style of debating not related to the topic at hand
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.