students in primary and secondary schools should be learning about puberty?
Debate Rounds (4)
Along time ago when woman had there periods they thought that they were dying! When its really perfectly natural.In Roman times they believed that when a woman had her period she was gifted by the gods! Which is not true.When men started to get deep voices they thought that something was really wrong with them.So we should learn about puberty so we know what's going on with our bodies.
As I think Children should not be taught sex education in school. The parents should teach there children about sex because often more teachers don"t know exactly behaviors or attitudes of their students but it is very simple for parents to do it. It is there child. They will also what to have sex afterwards. The only reason you would want to have sex ed is if you want people to have sex. There is no such thing as safe sex; all sex carries an inherent risk of negative outcomes (pregnancy, stds, etc.) as there is nothing that fully removes all probabilities of any negative outcomes occurring. Sex education is wrong do not let you kids learn from school.
My 2nd point is that you said that there are risks of negative outcomes like pregnancy,STD,etc. This is why we teach the children about the risks and show them pictures of the bad things that could happen to you if you do sex and they teach them what to do to prevent these things from happening.
Also you said there is no such thing as safe sex.Well there actually is.For example condoms, they prevent pregnancy by 99% and diseases and teachers will teach the students that condoms are only 99% protective some parents don't tell them this and don't teach there children how to put a condom on.And some parents don't even have the facts that the teachers do. Teachers are trained to say this.
Sex education is right and you should let your kids learn from it not only at home but also at school.
About your first point there may be a few cultural parents that feel shy to educate their kids about puberty and safe sex. In such a situation, there will be at least one person in the family who is most interactive with them. That person can teach him all about the puberty as the kid is most frank with him/her.
Now about your second point, if we start to teach a student about sex and puberty then definitely he/she will start to practice it whenever they will get free from teacher. In such a case they will not think about the risks because they will become completely interested in having fun. Because as you said many families do not want to discuss such subjects like sex then they will try to ignore teacher's suggestions as they usually do.
And you said that teacher will train them how to put on condom etc. then they will become eagerly to have sex with opposite gender due to such types of activities. As a result sex cases in teen ages will exponentially increase.
I am also agree that sex education is right and you should let your kids learn from it but only at home but not at school.
There is really not that much of a difference.At school they would teach you the same things that your parents would say but they just give you more facts,they'll give you activities and worksheets to provide more information.
Also some children are not really comfortable talking to there parents about sexual education and are shy to ask questions but when your with your teacher you might feel more comfortable and ask more questions.At school they don't promote sex there telling you the risks and negatives about sexual activity.
Now you said that because teachers teach people how to put condoms on etc then they will become eager to have sex with the opposite gender.Like I said there teaching you the risks of sex and that it has negative and you still have a RISK of becoming pregnant even if you use condoms.So if we learn about sexual education in schools then teen sex will decrease because like i said they will teach you the RISKS.
The same facts, activities and worksheets can be provided also at home along with the guider can tell him the real past experiences of family members about the sex risks and negative points.
As the most of the children feel more uncomfortable to talk with the teacher rather than with the parents in very simple situations (excepts some cases like you) then how can they talk about the most serious matter like sex.
As you said that 'At school they don't promote sex there telling you the risks and negatives about sexual activity' at home they can also be able to learn about the merits and advantages of having sex.
At last I think the teen age is the most deviating stage of one's life so it should be completely handed over to the parents that will make aware them about the mistakes that not to be happened in their life.
And also as it is a subject of puberty i think that the science subject has enough matter according to their age to have them an idea about puberty and to be healthy along with the parents.
As you said about no learning maths etc at school I will say that school is not a place only for building only theoritical concepts but also to learn the way to live a delicious life with an art of living.
In conclusion I will say that
Schools should leave the issues of puberty and sex to the parental units of children and instead the schools should focus on key subjects such as math and science for children.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by rajun 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: I cant say who won here...both were right but I think Pro did his job better and convinced me. Also, Con needs to spell check...
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.