superman beats batman
Debate Rounds (3)
1) While you may be right that Superman's powers give him an advantage over Batman, Batman has complete knowledge of every weakness and ability that Superman has. Due to their cooperation in the Justice League of America, Batman has experienced firsthand the level of Superman's abilities and has knowledge of how to avoid them, using acrobatics. Superman has openly called Batman "The Most Dangerous Man Alive"
2) Batman has an almost infinite supply of wealth wherein Superman has only his abilities. Batman could more than likely engineer a suit that is made specifically to resist the abilities of Superman. He can also (as he's done before) create a gas out of Kyrptonite and use it to disable Superman.
3) Batman is infinitely resourceful and can use anything to his advantage in a fight. I'd imagine a fight between them would be no-holds-barred.
4) In the vast encyclopedia of published comics, this fight has happened before, several times. Batman has won it most of the time. It is known that Batman always carries a piece of Kryptonite, and as previously stated, is extremely resourceful so he would find a way to use its abilities on Superman.
That brings me to my second point. Superman using a lead suit would be a disadvantage to him. Superman cannot fly as fast as he normally can with the suit, and even if does reach that level of speed, the heat produced by the air friction would melt it in a matter of seconds. A suit made of metal has its limits, meaning it can take its beating and break. This has happened before (Batman/Superman issues #44-#49, Search For Kryptonite). If Batman manages to cause enough damage to the lead suit, the kryptonite will have its effect of Superman.
Thanks for the debate!
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins this by a thin margin, mostly referencing issue numbers (making his argument warranted). It's probably be a close fight, but it really does depend on the writer.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.