pc is better than mac
PC is better than mac because WINDOWS IS MORE COMPATIBLE. Let's face it people, all software out there support windows. Do you want less clicks??? Well windows have Better keyboard shortcuts Windows is more customizable, you can make your windows look like mac, linux, and much more....
pc is better than mac
PC is better than mac because WINDOWS IS MORE COMPATIBLE. Let's face it people, all software out there support windows. Do you want less clicks??? Well windows have Better keyboard shortcuts Windows is more customizable, you can make your windows look like mac, linux, and much more. (I have the exact same debate with someone else but i didn't get to debate with him because he didn't post any argument. So I made another one.)...
Mac computers are better than PC's
Before starting my argument, let me clarify. By Mac computers, I mean computers with the Leopard or Snow Leopard operating system (10.5, 10.5.5, or 10.5.6). By PC's, I simply mean computers with Windows XP, Windows, Vista, or Windows 7. Also, I would like to thank my future opponent and wish him good luck. There are many advantages that Mac users can enjoy over PC users. Listed below are a few of them: 1. Macs are designed with "security in mind". Mac OSX is not affected by the myriad...
Video Debates should be allowed on debate.org
Video Response Round 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtZ_9hWYLLo...
Resolved: That, on balance, social networking Web Sites have a positive impact on the United States.
Social Networks are basically things like: FACEBOOK, MYSPACE, TAG, ZANGA... - They are good because they increase communication opportunities Nowadays, just calling and text messaging is not enough. There has to be some sort of quick communication occurring online, and that is what social networking does. - They stimulate our economy Social networking websites are able to advertise to their users based on what it looks like they or their friends would like. That comes in handy because it sa...
Debate.org version 3 will more likely than not be up and running by the time this debate concludes.
It is within my belief that debate.org version 3 will be up and running by the time this debate concludes. To define what I mean by this, I'm saying that the chances of debate.org version 3 being accessible before or at the time this debate concludes are at least 51%. Just to insure that this won't be a wait fest, I'll go ahead and provide a contention. For now, my one and only contention shall be that the webmaster stated that version 3 would be up by the end of July. Given that it is lon...
PoeJoe should immediately comply with the cease and desist order sent to him by debate.org
Earlier today, poejoe received a letter from Phil (owner of this website) ordering him to cease and desist from his part in the website (now closed) "debatedotcom.com", for trademark and copyright infringement. He has 48 hours to comply before it goes to the "next step". Poejoe is not compromising, I suggest he think otherwise. It is my position that he should immediately do whatever Phil says or face the consequences....
The all new Pak-a-Spak™ Rucksack will be a "must have" accessory for male commuters
Those of us who travel to work by train or metro will know all too well how difficult it is to get a seat in the rush hour and if a male commuter is fortunate enough to get a seat, social etiquette demands that he must give his seat up if he sees a lady standing. This inevitably means that a gentleman is never sat down for very long. But would his fellow passengers feel that he should relinquish his seat to a perfectly able-bodied woman if he was cradling a disabled toddler in his arms? No, o...
Mobile Phone Confirmation?
This is more of a question than a debate. Why does the site make you give your phone number to access certain features? Which features are they? I am against the mobile phone confirmation. CONTENTION I: I don't have a cell phone....
Given a strong enough computer, the game of chess can be solved so that one player can never lose.
The game of chess is solvable. Given enough data, a player, either white or black, I don't know which, would always be able to win or draw, despite the millions of possible combinations on the board. This also applies to other similar non-luck strategy games, including checkers, Khet, and Chinese Chess. I will continue my argument after my opponent responds. Definitions: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/solvable http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess solvable: susceptible of sol...