The Instigator
megawadlow
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
Inspired
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

terrorists

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
megawadlow
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/12/2013 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 528 times Debate No: 40429
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

megawadlow

Con

The U.S. should not negotiate with terrorists
Inspired

Pro

I find the resolution interesting. Although I would ask my opponent to put out some definitions and details on the topic at hand. How would they go about negotiating with terrorists? What terrorists are in question? Etc. Thank you, and I look forward to an interesting debate.
Debate Round No. 1
megawadlow

Con

terrorist: Osama_bin_Laden and so on
negotiate: take into consideration conforming with them

Ayman al-Zawahiri is the leader of al Qaeda. A reward up to $25 million has been offered by the U.S. government. Click through to see the men allegedly plotting, directing and, in some cases, carrying out acts of terror around the world.

Nasir al Wuhayshi is leader of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, known as AQAP

Ibrahim al Asiri is thought to be the chief bomb-maker for AQAP.

Ahmed Abdi Godane, also known as Mukhtar Abu Zubayr, is the leader of Al-Shabaab. A reward up to $7 million has been offered by the U.S. government.

are some terrorists
Inspired

Pro

Inspired forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
megawadlow

Con

megawadlow forfeited this round.
Inspired

Pro

Inspired forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
megawadlow

Con

megawadlow forfeited this round.
Inspired

Pro

Inspired forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
megawadlow

Con

megawadlow forfeited this round.
Inspired

Pro

Inspired forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by STALIN 3 years ago
STALIN
megawadlowInspiredTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins because Pro FF more rounds.Con also better arguments.