The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Meropenem777
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

the judgement of anubis

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Meropenem777
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/22/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 6 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 303 times Debate No: 91655
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (9)
Votes (1)

 

vi_spex

Pro

soda isnt money, holes in my teeth is money.. gods judgement is negative emotional consequence or attachment.. for your heart has been weighed

if a feather can not make you pause your tv.. you go to hell

the weakness of my power is my need for energy.. for what is my power without energy.. a stone tablet as but a stone.. a low battery..
Meropenem777

Con

The title says "the judgement of anubis", and this happens to be the name of a Yu-Gi-Oh card. Since the debate terms seem very unsensical, I am going to assume my opponent is implying a Yu-Gi-Oh duel and that I have to play a countercard to the one listed in the topic header.

Vi_Spex chose this Yu-Gi-Oh card:







I chose to play this card to counter it:





What will be your next move vi_spex?

Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

sry buddy, to much drinking bleach for you
Meropenem777

Con

Nope, I like drinking my hard lemonade just fine and awww, that's so sad! You got offended by my comment I made on your profile?

By the way, you have many grammar and spelling errors, so voters should certainly take off points for that. I will now refute the opening statements he made earlier.

"holes in my teeth is money" No, those are likely cavities from drinking too much bleach.

"gods judgement is negative emotional consequence or attachment.. for your heart has been weighed" This makes no sense. Your probably drunk on bleach.

"if a feather can not make you pause your tv.. you go to hell" Wow, telling me to go to hell. Voters, make sure to take off those conduct points!

"the weakness of my power is my need for energy" No, the "weakness of your power" might be dementia.

".. for what is my power without energy.. a stone tablet as but a stone.. a low battery.." Again, this is nonsensical.

Oh also, here is the definition for the term "nonsensical":

http://www.dictionary.com...

Now voters have to give me points for using the most reliable resources, assuming Vi_Spex won't cite a source in the next debate rounds. Also voters, keep in mind that Vi_Spex did not even present a coherent debate topic with debate terms. He just spewed gibberish, which is why it is appropriate for me to make the debate terms a Yu-Gi-Oh card game in the first place.

Here is Vi_Spex's card again:



My card I played earlier:




I ask again, what will be your next move Vi_Spex?

Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

infinite block is my card
Meropenem777

Con


My trump card. I win, hands down.
Your infinite block just got zapped to dust.


Debate Round No. 3
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by Meropenem777 6 months ago
Meropenem777
pew pew to you 2 mtf
Posted by vi_spex 6 months ago
vi_spex
pew pew
Posted by Meropenem777 6 months ago
Meropenem777
Likewise.
Posted by vi_spex 6 months ago
vi_spex
i am not you
Posted by Meropenem777 6 months ago
Meropenem777
good4me =p
Posted by vi_spex 6 months ago
vi_spex
well sir you have been blocked for the lenght of the nile, hah!
Posted by Meropenem777 6 months ago
Meropenem777
Vi_Spex's card: http://prntscr.com...

my card: http://prntscr.com...
Posted by Meropenem777 6 months ago
Meropenem777
is there anyway i can restore it?
Posted by Meropenem777 6 months ago
Meropenem777
what.. the card pictures are gone.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by BenD 6 months ago
BenD
vi_spexMeropenem777Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: There was a distinct lack of coherent argument, but Con had great sources.