The Instigator
hybrid
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
revic
Pro (for)
Winning
20 Points

the public's right to know is more important then the privacy of a celebrity

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
revic
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/26/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 545 times Debate No: 55449
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

hybrid

Con

Do you think different?
revic

Pro

Hi!
I'm accepting this debate assuming that you mean solely celebrities, and not actual state secrets.
I think you want to argue about politicians rather than musicians or actors, am I right?

In any case, I accept the challenge!
Debate Round No. 1
hybrid

Con

Hi,
I'm doing a project for school that includes a debate for the topic. I have to debate the pro for this topic. If you could give me some suggestions that would be great, thanks.

P.s when I mean celebrity, it can be singers, politicians, etc.
revic

Pro

The main argument con will come up with is the right to have freedom in what you do, the right of privacy.

It is obvious that celebrities, like all persons, need free time off the record to still enjoy their lives. The presence of a camera brings limits to what a person can do, and while the camera's are there, they are not free to do whatever they want. In other words, they would have less rights than the average person.

Very easily this can be compared to a normal person, like yourself: would you like to have everyone knowing what you're doing?

To my opponent: If you are really seeking pro-arguments, just come ask me. Your side of the debate is much more challenging anyway. The con arguments on this are so obvious.
Debate Round No. 2
hybrid

Con

hybrid forfeited this round.
revic

Pro

well, at least you're speeding it up.
Debate Round No. 3
hybrid

Con

hybrid forfeited this round.
revic

Pro

this is sad.
Debate Round No. 4
hybrid

Con

hybrid forfeited this round.
revic

Pro

FINALLY! great
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Ajab 2 years ago
Ajab
hybridrevicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
hybridrevicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro was the only one to offer arguments. Conduct to Pro for Con's multiple round forfeits.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
hybridrevicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
hybridrevicTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture.
Vote Placed by Cold-Mind 2 years ago
Cold-Mind
hybridrevicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Obviously...