The Instigator
monika_gupta
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
DoctorDeku
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points

there is necessary to amendment in law in india according current scenario

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
DoctorDeku
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/6/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 670 times Debate No: 28941
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

monika_gupta

Con

i think we have 300 crores of cases pending across india and if we tackle them with existing infra and pace than it will tale 135 years to solve all pending case that too if no new case gets registered
this is pathetic that we are not able to apply all that we have than why we need new?
DoctorDeku

Pro

This debate has been in the challenge period for a while now and no one has taken it, so I will accept the challenge of the Con.

As it stands Con does not pose a full argument, or even a legitimate premise of discussion as they do not have a clear claim, there is no warrant, there is no data and there is no impact. This method of advocacy is known as the Toulmin method[1] was proposed by British Philosopher Stephen Toulmin in his book 'The Uses of Argument[2]; it has since been accepted at large by the debate community as the most effective method of advocacy as it lies out the logical and empirical structure of the argument for the most effective discussion.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org...
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org...

As the Contender in this debate it is not my responsibility to prove the resolution false, but to disprove the Con; I am unable to do this so long as Con fails to provide a legitimate argument. So as it stands the vote must go to the Pro for upholding their burden by omission of the Con.

Accordingly I urge a vote for the Pro and hand this debate back to my opponent.
Debate Round No. 1
monika_gupta

Con

monika_gupta forfeited this round.
DoctorDeku

Pro

:I... Okay then.
Debate Round No. 2
monika_gupta

Con

monika_gupta forfeited this round.
DoctorDeku

Pro

Vote Pro :O!
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by DoctorDeku 1 year ago
DoctorDeku
It's not very clear what you want to debate based on the contents of your initial round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 1 year ago
bladerunner060
monika_guptaDoctorDekuTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF