The Instigator
sophisticatedhonesty
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TigerTime
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

there should be a certain limit on which extremist should be able to go concerning art

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
TigerTime
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/18/2013 Category: Arts
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 518 times Debate No: 29336
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

TigerTime

Con

I don't think you can put a limit on free-expression. If you do, than it isn't free.

I'll let Pro make his case before going any further.
Debate Round No. 1
sophisticatedhonesty

Pro

sophisticatedhonesty forfeited this round.
TigerTime

Con

TigerTime forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
sophisticatedhonesty

Pro

sophisticatedhonesty forfeited this round.
TigerTime

Con

Woah! I didn't realize I only had 5 minutes! Well, pro had the BoP and I at least gave one argument.

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by TigerTime 4 years ago
TigerTime
I think he's arguing that we should limit what we allow to be considered art because sometimes artists get really wierd.
Posted by wolfman4711 4 years ago
wolfman4711
Yeah really what are you talking about?
Posted by bladerunner060 4 years ago
bladerunner060
What is the debate here?
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by DoctorDeku 4 years ago
DoctorDeku
sophisticatedhonestyTigerTimeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Five Minutes? What? Anyway, forfeit on behalf of the Pro.
Vote Placed by 1Devilsadvocate 4 years ago
1Devilsadvocate
sophisticatedhonestyTigerTimeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: F.F.
Vote Placed by Xerge 4 years ago
Xerge
sophisticatedhonestyTigerTimeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Unusual debate. Con was the only one to provide an argument.