The Instigator
donkal
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points
The Contender
Glitter2998
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

there should be no laws

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
donkal
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/15/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 714 times Debate No: 83962
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (25)
Votes (3)

 

donkal

Pro

why should we be controlled in what we can and can't do? it is appalling that i have to wake up knowing that my life is boxed in by rules that people i've never met decide.
Glitter2998

Con

You are so stupid! THERE HAS TO BE LAWS!!!!! Otherwise, the world would be horrible and worse than it is now!
Debate Round No. 1
donkal

Pro

Animals live without law. why can't we?
there does not have to be law because we are animals. our ancestors lived without law. they survived.
Glitter2998

Con

True, lol
Debate Round No. 2
donkal

Pro

why should some rich politician tell me what i can and can't do? if i want to smoke crack let me smoke crack. if i want to kill in revenge why not? the law is stupid and pointless. stop bossing me around.
Glitter2998

Con

You REALLY wanna go there? REALLY?!?!
Debate Round No. 3
25 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by ImmortalVoddoler 1 year ago
ImmortalVoddoler
I'm sorry, but I'm a little confused here. Since when does being "rich and beautiful" make you better than everyone else? You cannot claim to be better than a random person on the internet by throwing random, untrue insults at them. That's not how you make friends.
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
Lol um okay. Whatever raises your self-esteem, sure.
Posted by Glitter2998 1 year ago
Glitter2998
You don't like me because you know I'm better than you? How juvenile!!
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
Yeah I just have to change it and resubmit.
Posted by Briannj17 1 year ago
Briannj17
Can you actually change your vote?
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
You're not a very good troll, glitter. And right now, you're not getting your way :P

But if you're rich, send me a couple hundred bucks, and I'll change my vote for you.
Posted by Glitter2998 1 year ago
Glitter2998
I am rich and beautiful. NO ONE talks back to me. Oh, and I get my way. ALWAYS.
Posted by Glitter2998 1 year ago
Glitter2998
Shut up. I'm done talking to you
Posted by Glitter2998 1 year ago
Glitter2998
Shut up. I'm done talking to you
Posted by donkal 1 year ago
donkal
you cannot argue you
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Brendan_Liam 1 year ago
Brendan_Liam
donkalGlitter2998Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: pro took it serious, con didn't.
Vote Placed by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
donkalGlitter2998Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - con called pro stupid. S&G - Con grossly overused caps lock and punctuation. Arguments - Pro provided that animals live without laws, and they seem to still be alive. Con conceded that argument and never provided any arguments other than abolishing laws would make the world worse than it is now without any substantiation.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
donkalGlitter2998Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Ad hominem form Con's part in the first round awards Pro the conduct points.