this house supports mandatory random drug testing in schools
Debate Rounds (3)
The Fourth amendment states-The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. People are secure in their persons so just forcing someone to take a drug test would go against the 4th amendment unless a warrant has been issued. The mandatory drug tests would be unconstitutional.
The cost of the drug test would be great. The average high school has 752 students and the average cost of a drug test is $38. That means to have these random drug test it will cost a school $28,576 for just one day. That money would no longer go toward education and would be wasted.
Jameses forfeited this round.
Furthermore, The right that every child is entitled to a safe education environment is not put into action without the random action.
The cost point you brought up is completely irrelevant.
The title is RANDOM drug testing. Not Drug testing. It is random so not all the students are tested all the time. This puts every student at a fair point, Anyone can be tested at any time and it will not be a case of. "I will not go in the day of the tests".
What the amendment entails is valid yes but by enforcing that you are neglecting so many entitlements and rights that the students of our schools deserve.
The facts speak for themselves.
70 percent of our students HAVE tried drugs and continue to do so
63 Percent are affecting others school work by creating hindrance in class.
Scare tactics and information days have been proven to not be working.
All in all, The many rights that I have brought up FARLEY outweigh the few you have brought up so I am going to ask.
Are you going to attempt to malliably go around one right to suit everyone, or break 35 human rights located in the constitutions of out nation.
All you can bring up can be countered with one of these rights and be outweighed by the rest so no matter what you say to counter this will be again outweighs by the sheer amount of rights you are neglecting and for that reason this house wins
The cost point is still relevant because if you are going to test everyone even if it is not at the same time the cost would be the same.
Bill of Rights is never invalid. I don't know what the 35 human rights that would be broken if we enforce the 4th amendment.
If you can tell if a child is intoxicated on drugs than ask them to leave the classroom than the 63 percent number is gone.
The perfect solution to stop 70 percent of student trying drugs is having some parents that parent.
Vote Con because this is unconstitutional.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by drafterman 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: FF plus Pro never really defended his stance (Despite the fact that it isn't unconstitutional, which Pro should have been able to successfully argue)
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.