time parodox's are not posible
Debate Rounds (3)
my starting statement is that if you could create a paradox, for instance touching your self in the past, I think it could not be unless it happened already. You cant change the past, and make a paradox, because if you did, it already would have happened, unless your the starting person, but I think if you were to create a paradox, you might just not be aloud to. this is probably really confusing and makes no sense im sorry.
grass forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by YoshiBoy13 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||2|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Con: Forfeit // Grammar to Con: im tired of people using apostrophe's for pluralization.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.