The Instigator
frenchmoosetwo
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Piffler
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

tomatoes are no the same as tomatoes

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Piffler
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/30/2010 Category: Technology
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,008 times Debate No: 11931
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)

 

frenchmoosetwo

Pro

-As the title states tomatoes are most definitely not the same as tomatoes..-

-No one will understand this for they are of IQ of 6-
Piffler

Con

Tomatoes are inherently the same as tomatoes, because they have the same definition, which according to dictionary.com is:

"any of several plants belonging to the genus Lycopersicon, of the nightshade family, native to mexico and Central and South America, esp. the widely cultivated species L. lycopersicum, bearing a mildly acid, pulpy, usually red fruit eaten raw or cooked as a vegetable."

To look at it another way, since tomatoes are included in the group of tomatoes, and vice versa, they must be one and the same.

Sources:
http://dictionary.reference.com...
Debate Round No. 1
frenchmoosetwo

Pro

frenchmoosetwo forfeited this round.
Piffler

Con

Please extend all of my arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
frenchmoosetwo

Pro

frenchmoosetwo forfeited this round.
Piffler

Con

Since my opponent failed to respond yet again, I urge a vote for the Con. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Piffler 7 years ago
Piffler
To justify my vote for myself:
Conduct to the CON since the PRO insinuated that I have an IQ of 6 and the PRO forfeited numerous rounds.
Spelling and grammar to the CON since the sentence insinuating that I have an IQ of 6 was grammatically incorrect.
Convincing arguments to the CON since PRO did not have any.
Sources to the CON since PRO did not have any.
Posted by frenchmoosetwo 7 years ago
frenchmoosetwo
oh ill extend yur arguements
Posted by Ore_Ele 7 years ago
Ore_Ele
Tautologies are not really tautologies. You just think they are.
Posted by frenchmoosetwo 7 years ago
frenchmoosetwo
oh jebus you got it
Posted by InsertNameHere 7 years ago
InsertNameHere
They're clearly different; TO-MAH-TOE and TO-MAY-TO.
Posted by frenchmoosetwo 7 years ago
frenchmoosetwo
you make no sense
Posted by lastrequest691 7 years ago
lastrequest691
This debate makes no sense.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Piffler 7 years ago
Piffler
frenchmoosetwoPifflerTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07