Debate Rounds (5)
perception and memory
i agree with you.. i am not specifik enough to argue with it x)
I love you bro.
Next round=Wylted debate analysis
Vi_spex has not used capitalization, granting me grammar points.
Vi_Spex has not provided premises for his arguments, when he has the burden of proof.
Vi_Spex conceded that he agreed with the con position in round 2
Vi_spex used no sources, while I cited David Hume in the first round, winning me source points.
Vi_Spex prides himself on losing, and wants the judges to vote for me.
I love you Vi_Spex. This was a pleasurable debate
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by kingkd 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: I reluctantly give the win to Con, as Pro conceded. Pro did not use good grammar as he did not use capitals
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.