The Instigator
lol101
Con (against)
Winning
19 Points
The Contender
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

vi_spex cannot lose a debate

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
lol101
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/23/2015 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 434 times Debate No: 76861
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (8)
Votes (5)

 

lol101

Con

vi_spex has claimed in comments before that he literally can't lose a debate. I negate that claim by making two points.

1. I myself have beaten vi_spex at debating twice.

Debate: http://www.debate.org...
Result: Post Voting Period. lol101 wins 4-0

Debate: http://www.debate.org...
Result: Post Voting Period. lol101 wins 6-0

2. As of right now, vi_spex has lost 177 debates and has a win ratio of 6.35 %. http://www.debate.org...

Thus, I have proven that vi_spex can lose a debate. My opponent must prove otherwise using evidence to debunk my argument and sources.
vi_spex

Pro

votes prove nothing
Debate Round No. 1
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by PowerPikachu21 1 year ago
PowerPikachu21
Actually, if the resolution was "vi_spex has never won a debate", I'd be Con because vi_spex has won a few debates, not nearly as much as he lost, but he still won some.
Posted by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 1 year ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
***************************************************************************
>Reported vote: evanjfarrar// Mod action: NOT Removed<

4 points to Pro (Arguments, Conduct). Reasons for voting decision: Con is right, sorry Pro.

[*Reason for non-removal*] Troll debate. We don't moderate these.
*******************************************************************************
Posted by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 1 year ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
*************************************************************
>Reported vote: TinyBudha// Mod action: NOT Removed<

3 points to Con (Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: This depends highly on the word lose, and Vi could have won if he knew how to argue it, but because of this lack of any response I think I have to vote for the other guy :/

[*Reason for non-removal*] Troll debate. We don't moderate these.
***************************************************************
Posted by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 1 year ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
*****************************************************
>Reported vote: Midnight1331// Mod action: NOT Removed<

2 points to Con (Sources). Reasons for voting decision: Sources were only used by Con.

[*Reason for non-removal*] Troll debate. We don't moderate these.
************************************************************
Posted by lol101 1 year ago
lol101
Go on and believe that you won, I won't feed the troll.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
you Guys assert you win, while, i do win
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
i did win
Posted by TinyBudha 1 year ago
TinyBudha
This depends highly on the word lose, and Vi could have won if he knew how to argue it, but because of this lack of any response I think I have to vote for the other guy :/
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by evanjfarrar 1 year ago
evanjfarrar
lol101vi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con is right, sorry Pro.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 1 year ago
Ragnar
lol101vi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's case seemed to suffer gross retardation, three single words as an assertion, with no attempt to give any merit to it. Con on the other hand provided three powerful sources, each of which alone would prove their case. Pro failed at even linking a single victory in debates. Worse this is a single round debate, the person going second can easily win every time due to the person going first having no ability to defend their claims against even the most basic attempt at refutation, which was not done.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 1 year ago
9spaceking
lol101vi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:50 
Reasons for voting decision: con uses sources to show that Vi_spex really can lose debates
Vote Placed by TinyBudha 1 year ago
TinyBudha
lol101vi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: coments
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
lol101vi_spexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:20 
Reasons for voting decision: Sources were only used by Con.