The Instigator
Beondel
Pro (for)
Losing
2 Points
The Contender
The-Voice-of-Truth
Con (against)
Winning
14 Points

vi_spex competition

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
The-Voice-of-Truth
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/28/2015 Category: Arts
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,967 times Debate No: 74383
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (36)
Votes (4)

 

Beondel

Pro

Whoever can acy more like vi_spex= winner=truth

sense is a nut =crust

truth is truth is winner, winner=inside crust=truth

truth is inside sense

Con turn
The-Voice-of-Truth

Con

I accpet and look forward to doing this debate.


there is good, reasons to do this debate. i, intend to, win.

reason+intent=morality=right=truth

truth=winner=be most like vi_spex

The-Voice-of-Truth=truth, truth is in name.


truth=1

0=false, make an apple nothing

false=0=belief=be lie=god, as i have to imagine it.

information=0


0+1=1 is false equation,
pick up 0 sodas from the floor.

0+1=1=0; 1=0

information=0,1


information=0=false


information=1=truth


truth=false


the-voice-of-truth=truth=false=belief=be lie=god


bow down.. you crazy person :)
Debate Round No. 1
Beondel

Pro

Con assertion is false, as opposite of true, reality. Think about it - truth = opposite of reality = apposite of false. you can't pick up 0 sodas off floor, 0*6(6). therefore although correct true=1, 0=false!=make an apple nothing.

0= apple in 4 pieces = 0 apples, 4 pieces
0 = truth in sense
1 = no apple in hand,

If you pick up 0 sodas off of floor, you have 0 soda, or cut soda in to bits of soda, then still 0 sodas. Pick 0 sodas off of floor.

having all parts of something = not something, as something is opposite of 0, 0=nothing. parts=0 of whole
you see?

LIKEWISE, true not= flase, truth is opposite of false, as seomthing in existence has an opposite for it to exist, as in senses, as in nut. for nut shell to exist, 0!=1, truth=true!=false
The-Voice-of-Truth

Con

0=false=information

1=matter=true

false=opposite of reality. reality=real=true; reality=opposite of false. false=opposite of true.

0=/= truth in sense; truth=1

0=no apple in hand

apple in 4 pieces=object=matter=1

0+1=1 is false equation. pick up 0 sodas from the floor. can't add nothing(0) to 1.

0+1=0; 1=1

all parts of something=matter=something=1

"for nut shell to exist, 0!=1"; 0(false)=1(truth), concede my point. "true=true!=false", concede my point.


Debate Round No. 2
Beondel

Pro

Beondel forfeited this round.
The-Voice-of-Truth

Con

sound=valid=object

object is true; true=matter=1=fact. i just looked at my dog, is that a fact?

if you, believe that i didnt just look at my dog, what is your position on my claim..

a(theism)=dis(belief)=theism=belief=be lie=false.

believe (be lie) that i looked at my dog, is false(0).

you agree with me then :)


Debate Round No. 3
Beondel

Pro

you agree with both :)

I give up dude. I went into this thinking that I was a decent vi_spex linguist, and I just got destroyed. You win
The-Voice-of-Truth

Con

i have no intention of joining a religion
Debate Round No. 4
Beondel

Pro

Beondel forfeited this round.
The-Voice-of-Truth

Con

you agree with me then :)
Debate Round No. 5
36 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Beondel 2 years ago
Beondel
Honestly, I'm already mad. I've been pouring over vi_spex debates for the past 3 hours instead of studying for my remaining AP exams. What is going on right now...
Posted by Diqiucun_Cunmin 2 years ago
Diqiucun_Cunmin
LOL at the votes too XD
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 2 years ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
Those votes tho, LOL.
Posted by Chaosism 2 years ago
Chaosism
Keep studying, Beondel, and you will learn! That is, unless you go mad, first...
Posted by tejretics 2 years ago
tejretics
0=nothing=information
1=something=matter

0+1=1 is false equation. pick up 0 sodas from the floor.
0=false, make an apple nothing
god=belief
atheism=belief
belief=be lie, as I have to imagine it

i dont have beliefs
Posted by Beondel 2 years ago
Beondel
Will do, Mr. Truth ;)
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 2 years ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
I ask that my opponent waits until the very end of his posting time period to post his argument, as I will be gone tomorrow, and will not return until Monday of next week (unless, of course, he posts in the next 30 minutes).
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 2 years ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
Oh wait, I get it. It's French right?

And thanks. :P
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 2 years ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
@Tejretics, Englisch, bitte.
Posted by tejretics 2 years ago
tejretics
La Voix de la V"rit" doit gagner!
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Diqiucun_Cunmin 2 years ago
Diqiucun_Cunmin
BeondelThe-Voice-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: a blind man touched an elephant's toe, thought it was a tin can. a seeing man said it was an elephant's toe, blind man nods head. concession, is it good conduct? conduct=concession=pro what can you do, if close your eyes when you vote? then you do not see that con is winner, winner. like vi-spex = voice = winner. belief = information = experience, invalid position. maybe you, noob slime, if you think voice more like vi-spex, you have no experience with vi-spex? more equations + less grammar = more vi-spex style = con
Vote Placed by tejretics 2 years ago
tejretics
BeondelThe-Voice-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Concession + forfeiture = VoT = truth = 1 = 0 = false = belief = be lie = god = winner. =>> Translation: Pro forfeited and conceded.
Vote Placed by Chaosism 2 years ago
Chaosism
BeondelThe-Voice-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeits and concession by Pro. Spelling and grammar to Con, because Pro used too many grammatically correct statements, and capitalized too many letter, which does not fit vi_spex format. Both participants did well, but Con held true to vi_spex philosophical logic, which was impressive. Con's arguments much more closely reflect not only vi_spex format, but the style of his replies. For instance, "i have no intention of joining a religion" was a brilliant argument. Arguments to Con. Neither participant cited sources which is good, because vi_spex does not cite sources and doing so would have cost them points.
Vote Placed by Valkrin 2 years ago
Valkrin
BeondelThe-Voice-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: pro = concession = good for con pro = polite and full of conduct con = winner