The Instigator
yourmomsucksdezznuts
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
fire_wings
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

violent games vs non violent games

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
fire_wings
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/25/2016 Category: Games
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 430 times Debate No: 90187
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

yourmomsucksdezznuts

Pro

Austin is a little but hole
fire_wings

Con



The Burden of Proof is on Pro. But because he made no arguments, you ought to be votin for CON!!!

My opponent's argument, "Austin is a little but hole" is irrelevant according to the resolution of video games.

My argument is that violent video games makes children's brains worse, and it makes your children more violent, only in a more physical way.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...

Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by CAHAL101 1 year ago
CAHAL101
this should have never been a debate in the first place its very uncalled for
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by datGUUYY 1 year ago
datGUUYY
yourmomsucksdezznutsfire_wingsTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: One of them didn't argue. This was clearly a stacked debate. But he still won...
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
yourmomsucksdezznutsfire_wingsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: The debate's sides are quite unclear as Pro only writes "Austin is a but hole" which is both vague and irrelivant to the debate at hand. It is neither an argument for or against the resolution. With the debate the way is set up, I am only to assume that Pro is defending violent games and Con is non-violent games. The Burden of Proof is on Pro in this debate, however, Pro does not meet this as his argument is untopical. Con provides an argument that violent games makes children mimic the game and increase their violence. With Con being the only one to make a relivent argument to the resolution then I, as a voter, should prefer his case over that of Pro's. With that I award the arguments points to Con.