The Instigator
emmabear2232
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
Copenator_Debater
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

we need animal testing for the safety of humans

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Copenator_Debater
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/15/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 880 times Debate No: 27273
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

emmabear2232

Pro

Animal testing is the most humane way for scientist to make scientific discoveries, testing on humans could kill us for the benifet of others. Like an eye for an eye. Well remeber an eye for an eye makes the world go blind.
Copenator_Debater

Con

I do agree that it is the most humane way to do that, but a animals are so much different then humans. Testing on humans could kill us, but Scientist cannot make someone do testing for science unless they agree. As long as the person agrees to it, it is perfectly fine to set their life at risk, that is their own choice.
Debate Round No. 1
emmabear2232

Pro

thanks for the opinion
Copenator_Debater

Con

What was this for?
Debate Round No. 2
emmabear2232

Pro

my friend is writing a speech in english about this topic, she is the only one who thinks that animals need to be tested for the sake of humans, and evryone else doing the same topic doesnt agree at all and i really just love her point of view
Copenator_Debater

Con

Well its a good topic.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by darkcity 4 years ago
darkcity
Some people thought the latest batman film would be good too ; -)
Posted by baseballkid 4 years ago
baseballkid
I thought this was going to be good.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Clash 4 years ago
Clash
emmabear2232Copenator_DebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro responded to Con by simply just saying 'thanks for the opinion'. Thus, I will give Con the argument point. In my opinion, animal testing for the betternes and safety of us humans is completely justified. Unfortunately, Pro didn't give any good arguments to prove this.
Vote Placed by larztheloser 4 years ago
larztheloser
emmabear2232Copenator_DebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Giving con his point back as pro doesn't deserve to have a tie for this. The opinions section exists for a reason, and I recommend people use it. Arguments I think is legitimate to tie in this debate.
Vote Placed by Zaradi 4 years ago
Zaradi
emmabear2232Copenator_DebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Countering out tulle's conduct point since I feel like neither deserve to have a win recorded for this .-.
Vote Placed by tulle 4 years ago
tulle
emmabear2232Copenator_DebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Gave Con the conduct point because I was really looking forward to this debate, and it looks like Pro started it for no reason? >.<