we should eat less junk food
Debate Rounds (2)
Problems with the resolution
My adversary states, in the resolution, that "we" should eat less junk food. First of all, who is the "we" in here? It seems like my adversary is stating that all people on the Earth should eat less junk food, including those who have already cut down on junk food or don't eat it at all. This causes the debate to be about whether or not all people on the face of the Earth should cut down on junk food, which is a near-impossible or plain impossible BOP to uphold.
What my opponent states is that people should cut down on junk food because it makes for a healthier body and therefore stops bullying.. However correct this might be, this statement is a weak argument. Firstly, bullies don't just make fun of fat people or even thin people who eat lots of junk food. Second, it seems that exercise does not come to mind for my opponent. Thirdly, it's for the person eating junk food to decide whether or not to cut down on junk food - it's their body.
tammyisright forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by NoMagic 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||1|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made no arguments. Con is far to knit picking with his/her objections though. We can logically infer what Pro means by the resolution. We (in general) should eat less junk food. Con should take a little more reasonable of an approach to debating. We are free to make logical inferences in order to reasonably understand the subject. That being said, Pro let a round expire. That is simply a lose and poor conduct on Pro's part.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.