The Instigator
souparnanellikode
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Brainmaster
Pro (for)
Winning
12 Points

we should follow the west for development and need not think of our rich tradition

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/22/2011 Category: Economics
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 6,324 times Debate No: 17175
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)

 

souparnanellikode

Con

i think we should be conciouss of our indian tadition before running behin the western civilisation
Brainmaster

Pro

It's quite obvious how the west has advanced over the rest of the world. If so, it makes more sense to follow them.
Debate Round No. 1
souparnanellikode

Con

souparnanellikode forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
souparnanellikode

Con

souparnanellikode forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by gerrandesquire 5 years ago
gerrandesquire
What the hell?
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
souparnanellikodeBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by baggins 5 years ago
baggins
souparnanellikodeBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pity, it could have been a good debate topic!
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 5 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
souparnanellikodeBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Interesting topic. I lived there for 2 years.
Vote Placed by shooterboss 5 years ago
shooterboss
souparnanellikodeBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Spelling and grammar errors on Con. Two forfeits on Con.
Vote Placed by Sieben 5 years ago
Sieben
souparnanellikodeBrainmasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: k