The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

we should make chocolate our president

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/5/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 424 times Debate No: 89212
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)




all of the presidential candidates suck , i mean they really suck , when was the last time chocolate milk made you un happy? Lactose in-torrential? get over it because this is the future


Chocolate can NOT be our President of the United States, for a number of reasons:

-It wouldn't be able to tell everyone it was running in the first place.

-It wouldn't be able to fund it's campaign.

-If it somehow become President, chocolate wouldn't be able to meet with country leaders.

-It wouldn't be able to make any choices on it's own (Cabinet members, Supreme Court Justices, etc).

-It wouldn't be able to sign OR veto any laws whatsoever

Debate Round No. 1


Well you see Chocolate milk is the future our country needs it sweetness represents the kindness we need in our nation its creamy brown color represents the mixture of our nationalities and cultures and the fact that it can spoil so easily repersents how things can go to hell real quick when the wrong person is ion charge


Just because we "need" chocolate milk doesn't mean it should be our nation's leader. Hell, when the milk spoils, won't that count as it "dying"? If it somehow did get elected, it would "die" within a couple of weeks. It's more disposable than a handgun from a crime scene.
Debate Round No. 2


well you see as long as we have cows there will always bee chocolate milk so we should keep our dairy cows in good health and the supply of milk flowing. As the milk spoiled we could replace it with more


While that may be true, you never rebutted my first arguments. They were important, as they say what chocolate wouldn't be able to do as President. Plus, that would make people not like Chocolate milk, since it wouldn't do anything good as President. End of story.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by elloguvna 2 years ago
i said chocolate milk not just chocolate .....there is so many kinds of chocolate you need to be more specific when you argue
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lord_megatron 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro argued that chocolate never disappoints. Con argued that it won't be able to make the decisions required to run a country. Pro didn't rebut