The Instigator
evanyang
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points
The Contender
eyyang0403
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points

we should never eat food or drink

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
evanyang
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/10/2016 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 393 times Debate No: 93560
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

evanyang

Con

1) you will die of starvation and thirst and not have a good life


when you are a baby you need to eat a lot of food, but the baby will die affter a few weeks of not eating food or drinking water.



eyyang0403

Pro

This is a VERY unfair topic, just to state.
1) Can't the people just eat carbonated food and water? Doesn't mean that they can't eat food and water at all.
2) Also, this topic is so biased towards his side. I only wanted to debate this is because he challenged me to one and I never knew. Now this is a ridiculous topic and favoring his side, so vote for my side. Thank you.
Debate Round No. 1
evanyang

Con

he is making an exuse and that he wants to win so you should vote for me
eyyang0403

Pro

Actually, no i'm not... This is an unfair debate that COMPLETELY favors his side. Who would want to starve to death even if you have the money to?
Debate Round No. 2
evanyang

Con

why did he even choose this deabate round besides h does not have a argument
eyyang0403

Pro

As a matter of fact, I do. Referring to argument#1

Now For all of the reasons above, If you want a debate round to be this unfair to people, then vote for the con. But if you want this debate.org to be a fair place where you can debate without people spamming these create debate buttons and making something that isn't even useful, vote affirmative.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by minecraftfordayz123 1 year ago
minecraftfordayz123
OH, but I should the best grammar points!
Posted by minecraftfordayz123 1 year ago
minecraftfordayz123
OH, but I should the best grammar points!
Posted by SM29 1 year ago
SM29
Neither of you made any logical points, it's just immature name calling.

You two wouldn't happen to be members of Congress would you?
Posted by eyyang0403 1 year ago
eyyang0403
Same with the con...
Posted by evanyang 1 year ago
evanyang
my opp does not have arguments!
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Bored_Debater 1 year ago
Bored_Debater
evanyangeyyang0403Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's argument extends throughout the debate, I was convinced by it. If you don't eat or drink you die & that isn't good. Pro had better spelling and grammar so he gets a point in that regard. No one used any sources so that is a tie.
Vote Placed by evanjfarrar 1 year ago
evanjfarrar
evanyangeyyang0403Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro should not have accepted the debate challenge if he viewed it to be unfair. Con makes a single argument that extends throughout the entire debate without adequate rebuttal.
Vote Placed by BenJWasson 1 year ago
BenJWasson
evanyangeyyang0403Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made the obvious argument of starvation, it stood throughout the debate. Pro made the argument of carbonated drinks and food, however that is still food and drink, it's just a type of it. Pro said that it was an unfair debate however that isn't valid at all considering he accepted the challenge. Neither of you used sources, so that is a tie.