Debate Rounds (5)
legal legalize the plant, should it or should it not be mad legal is the qushtin.
I will try to avoid the brick wall layout as most of the voters complained about that. so have fun guys and remember I can not spell to good so if you want clean writhing with out spelling arers then I am not it.
legal- allowed to be consumed without punishment
most of this is about drugs pearide but near the end I find it okay um I think in the 10 Minuit margin if you like you can watch the whole thing.
It make many people happy if it where legal two, keeping most of are jails free for the rapist, murderers and robbers.
I can not spell, It is a hit or miss subject for me, if my spell check can fix it then good. My last debates have been more of testing ground for me, so I hope I can do better.legal legalize the plant, should it or should it not be mad legal is the qushtin.I will try to avoid the brick wall layout as most of the voters complained about that. so have fun guys and remember I can not spell to good so if you want clean writhing with out spelling arers then I am not it.This is his round one. It has no argument.
Also legal legalize the plant makes no sense.I didn't post an argument because he is pro and I usually allow Pro to go first. How am I rude? He is showing rudeness and aggression by saying I am aggressive.
I am going to do something different today. I will post my refutations and then my argument.
Youtube video- for some reason youtube doesn't work on my computer, so I can't watch it. More or less, you can't post a video, expect people to watch and use it as evidence. You must type out your evidence.My opponent says that it make many people happy, but less use some deductive logic. If money can't bring you happiness and you use money to buy weed, then weed can't bring happiness. Weed only kills brain cells and makes people less reactant to their emotions. Also happy is an opinionated word, and can't be proven by facts. Also just because it makes people happy doesn't mean it should be legal. Killing people makes some people happy but it's illegal. Bigamy makes people happy, but it is illegal.My opponent says that this will keep jails free for the rapist murderers and robbers, but murderers, rapists, and robbers go to prison, not jail.
Weed causes health problems- weed can cause many problems, hindering the ability to learn, causes lung problems, and brain damage, making them unable to be productive in society. It also can make people get sick by lowering their immune health.http://www.theantidrug.com...
Weed impairs motor usage- when marijuana users drive cars, they lose reaction ability. This could endanger the user and people around. By the way, if you do hit somebody, you could get a manslaughter charge, and that might send you to jail.
Weed can cause cancer, birth defects, and hormone problems.
These reasons and more are reasons why weed should be kept illegal.
I did apologize for saying that statement in the comments. I just realized that, but this is coming from a 20 year old man that can't spell if his life depended on it. I have did research on you before I entered this debate. Your spelling has been so bad that people couldn't even understand what you were saying. I am only 14 years old turning 15 this Friday. It was a simple mistake. In one of your debates, you stated that you were religious. When I think of religious, I hope that means according to Christianity. Anyways, the Bible says "Don't talk about the speck of dust in someone's eye when there is a large plank in yours. First you must remove the plank from your eye, then you can talk about the speck of dust in someone else's eye." Fix your spelling before you talk about my reading comprehension skills.
Back On Debate Topic
My opponent hasn't refuted any of my argument or baked up any of his arguments. Vote Con!
ickda forfeited this round.
Well, viewers. Vote Con!
My opponent says I have lack of sense, but he spelled wikipedia wrong and instead of dot org, he put not org. Second, I did not use wikipedia, I used debatepedia.
He has not refuted any of my arguments and that is why you should vote Con. I am sorry for what happened at the beginning of the debate; please vote for me despite of what happened.
I have presented better arguments and he has not refuted any of mine and that is why I should win.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by wrichcirw 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||7|
Reasons for voting decision: PRO forfeited, had terrible spelling, and did not even formulate his position until CON did it for him. PRO never argued for his position, but just kept citing butthurt.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.